enterthemist

5 ms·

1.
by enterthemist 12y ago
Thank you so much for trying the application! I apologize again, it is in the beta, and it is hard to test for all environments. I would be eternally grateful if you sent me an email at ofer at enterthemist dot com with the operating system
2.
by enterthemist 12y ago
Hi, We've been working on this for far too long without releasing it. It is still a Beta and has a few rough edges, but we would appreciate any and all feedback.
3.
Show HN: Send and Receive SMS from your computer(raven.enterthemist.com)
2 points by enterthemist 12y ago|3 comments
4.
by enterthemist 12y ago
Hi, I am building a messaging client that is designed to be cross compatible with all types of messaging (email, sms, xmpp) but more importantly sort / group the messages in an easy to use way. I could really use some feedback on the p
5.
by enterthemist 13y ago
There is a donut place in Berkeley that works very similar to that. The reason for them is that there are a lot of large-scale orders that want the donuts for breakfast (e.g. the school dining facilities).
6.
by enterthemist 13y ago
Thanks for the feedback, is that better?
7.
by enterthemist 13y ago
Hi, I've been working hard on my startup: Raven. It attempts to make email simpler to deal with by letting you separate your messages however you like: by sender, by tag, by group of people. Furthermore, it can aggregate all of the sou
8.
by enterthemist 13y ago
> Your secret sauce, if I understand it correctly, is open sourcing the client side code and providing some mechanisms to assure end users that what they are executing matches the publically published code. Yes, the js client is fully in
9.
by enterthemist 13y ago
The container is abstracted, so it can receive whatever type of js the server wants to send. Specifically, the js that we will use will not be compiled so that it can be verified (and it will also be open source). The main problem with this
10.
by enterthemist 13y ago
It is different in that it creates a key distribution interface for the average person. This interface allows things like decrypting emails in the browser and transparent security. It also allows you to know who has security and who doesnt
11.
by enterthemist 13y ago
Some key differences are that we do not store your emails, your email provider does. We do not ever, at any point, have access to your unencrypted keys. Therefore, we cannot, even if forced to turn over access to your data. That being said,
12.
by enterthemist 13y ago
As tlrobinson says, the problem is that we dont want you to have to trust us. One of our goals is to minimize the amount of trust you have to place in us. Therefore, we want you to be safe if we are forced to try and steal your keys. See my
13.
by enterthemist 13y ago
You are probably correct. In fact, our solution allows for this type of checking explicitly so that we can (when possible) migrate to better protocols. Interestingly enough, I like your analogy because in all honesty, email is simply file s
14.
by enterthemist 13y ago
Rome wasnt built in a day, as the saying goes. Our solution here tries to solve a few of the problems to start with. The goal, however, is to maintain a list of urls, sha1 hashes, update times, and a list of verifiers. The sha1 hashes make
15.
by enterthemist 13y ago
Firstly, I want to applaud mailpile for their efforts. Next, I'd like to respond to you with what our product is aiming to solve (because that is what I know best). > All innovation in the secure email space has been blocked for the
16.
by enterthemist 13y ago
I am working on a solution to this very problem: http://raven.enterthemist.com
17.
by enterthemist 13y ago
Hello, we are working on this startup to help people regain control of their freedom of speech. As we near a beta, we would like any feedback that you have. Also feel free to sign up for the mailing list! Thanks for spending the time to che
18.
Show HN: Simple encrypted email that anyone can use(raven.enterthemist.com.)
3 points by enterthemist 13y ago|1 comments
19.
by enterthemist 13y ago
> I'm under no doubt whatsoever that if the NSA show up and grab all my hardware, and wave their $5 wrench menacingly, I'll give them all the keys/passphrases they ask for. True enough, but we could also implement a duress
20.
by enterthemist 13y ago
> is there a landing page to follow? Not yet. We are a couple of months away from an alpha. > will it work on every device out there? It currently builds for Windows, Mac, and Ubuntu but we will expand this in the future to include An
21.
by enterthemist 13y ago
What you describe is a simple man in the middle attack albeit executed in a very complicated manner. With public key encryption using SSL you have end to end security under two assumptions: the NSA cannot break the public key structure and
22.
by enterthemist 13y ago
We are working on a simple end-to-end encrypted email solution with the encryption being nearly completely transparent to the user (i.e. simple enough for the average person to use). Furthermore, with our solution, if the government ordered