Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
enriquepablo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
enriquepablo
10mo ago
LLMs tell you one thing and not its negation, this choice is semantic. "just language in absence of any context or reference" is a set that includes every valid text. The usefulness of LLMs is their ability to mostly respect whate
2.
▲
by
enriquepablo
10mo ago
The Chomsky hierarchy is a classification of grammars. So it's about Syntax. GPT is purely about semantics, about truth. To the extent that I think it can be said to be fundamentally informal in its dedication to truth, since it can ea
3.
▲
by
enriquepablo
1y ago
The article shows one, the kind of double torus - though I do not understand how neighbourhoods that intersect the line of contact between the 2 "tubes" can be mapped to R².
4.
▲
by
enriquepablo
2y ago
Thanks for reading :)
5.
▲
by
enriquepablo
2y ago
"There is a true SENTENCE". Sentence, not sentience.
6.
▲
Designing a Conscious Machine
(github.com)
2 points
by
enriquepablo
2y ago
|
5 comments
7.
▲
by
enriquepablo
2y ago
Designing a conscious machine
8.
▲
by
enriquepablo
3y ago
The idea here is not to understand why some combinatorial problems are hard and others easy, but rather to just be able to distinguish between them. So, instead of understanding why the measure functions structure the solution spaces the wa
9.
▲
Sorting the Travelling Salesman Problem
(github.com)
3 points
by
enriquepablo
3y ago
|
3 comments
10.
▲
by
enriquepablo
3y ago
An attempt at understanding the difference that makes the sorting problem (the problem solved by sorting algorithms), but not the travelling salesman problem, efficiently solvable, looking at the topologies of their solution spaces.
11.
▲
by
enriquepablo
4y ago
But the cosmic microwave background refers to one single event, that has echoes everywhere, right? If I understand correctly, you don't need to synchronize anything to have echoes everywhere.
12.
▲
by
enriquepablo
4y ago
As far as I understand (I'm not a physicist), to be able to say that the universe is isotropic across space, you need a point of view that just doesn't exist. You cannot speak about an absolute synchronicity among events happening
13.
▲
by
enriquepablo
5y ago
How does Yode compare with tree-sitter?
14.
▲
by
enriquepablo
5y ago
> Nuanced and rigorous history requires careful and objective study to truly understand. Have you read https://acoup.blog/ ? Another reader above (@iainctduncan) said: > Years ago he was a springboard for me to read fu
15.
▲
by
enriquepablo
5y ago
With uindex, you provide a Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG) [1], and you obtain a database that can hold, as data, unicode strings structured according to the top production of the provided PEG. You can then query the db for tokens correspo
16.
▲
Show HN: Uindex, a data store that uses Parsing Expression Grammars as schemata
(github.com)
3 points
by
enriquepablo
5y ago
|
1 comments
17.
▲
by
enriquepablo
6y ago
I would say that you are mixing up "parsing" and "calendaring (or something of the sort)". As far as I understand parsing is syntactic analysis, i.e. going from a linear structure to a more complex structure (usually a t
18.
▲
by
enriquepablo
6y ago
At the beginning of "multiverse.html" you say "In the beginning of the 19th century..." I think you mean 20th.
19.
▲
by
enriquepablo
6y ago
I think that there is a distinction that is interesting to make here: human made systems vs natural systems. Human made systems have a source of systemic debt that natural systems cannot have, due to human errors. In the natural systems, &q
20.
▲
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
> then the burden of proof is on you to show that lying is in effect Don't say on "me", I was just offering a plausible side. But I agree it is a difficult question. There is the point you make, but there is also the point
21.
▲
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
> As a result, it's worth cautioning people that just because a fact of foreign policy efforts was true 100 years ago does not mean that it is true today. Perhaps we might say something contrarian to this: if it was something true 1
22.
▲
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
> For regular people in China, does the addition of Google with some censorship make their life better? ... I think the answer is obvious. I think the answer is obvious, but in the opposite sense you imply. Google acts as a window into t
23.
▲
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
DNA is an anti-secret in the same way that digital rights management schemes are an anti-secret. DRM schemes only work through legal support; and in my opinion, legally protecting the secrecy of DNA is much more sensible (from a human pow,
24.
▲
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
> Anonymity is weakened if we tie authentication to biometrics. I think you mean pseudonimity. There should be no authentication in anonimity. > Something you know (as in password) is always theoretically more secure than something yo
25.
▲
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
> The password ... is a way of identifying that you are you. That is not correct. The "system" identifies you by your ID (username - biometrics - whatever). And for the system to ensure that whatever actions you perform on it,
26.
▲
A forward chaining algorithm with cost logarithmic wrt number of rules + facts
(gitlab.com)
2 points
by
enriquepablo
7y ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
by
enriquepablo
11y ago
Requests is or has been the most downloaded egg from pypi. If you have used it, you'll know why: it makes dealing with http requests a pure pleasure. Dead easy to remember how to use it, and dead easy to read it. So discouraging this k
28.
▲
by
enriquepablo
13y ago
I think that you should discriminate between "violence" in Physics and "violence" in Ethics.
29.
▲
by
enriquepablo
13y ago
>> The anger that motivated the writing of the Cookbook blinded me to the illogical notion that violence can be used to prevent violence. > The leaders of almost every major revolution eventually reached precisely the opposite conc
30.
▲
by
enriquepablo
13y ago
> To properly mimic this property with yes/no questions, you will have to come up with questions that divide the whole Earth's population equally AT EVERY NEW QUESTION. Not only that: The first question must divide the populati
More ›