Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
enkid
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
751.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
We don't know why salesforce did this. The RNC until now has not been denied anything from big tech that I recall. To me, this likely means someone in the RNC wanted to send out an email organizing an angry protest. Salesforce absol
752.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I haven't used Parler, but from what I read there were loads of people actively calling for violence. Sure, there's no set line, but Amazon shouldn't have to support that if they don't want to.
753.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Isn't that exactly what the above comment is saying?
754.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I don't think it's fair to lump everyone into a pile like that. I agree with the decision of tech companies not to host Parler and disagree with leaking its contents. The comments section on any forum is made of a variety of peop
755.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Twitter is not a monopoly. There are plenty of media companies, social or not, that he could use to carry his message. He has a freaking press office.
756.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Suspend means to literally hold up above the ground. A suspension bridge is called that because something is "above" it holding it up.
757.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I think the word you're looking for is hyperbole/hyperbolic?
758.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
It's almost like some event just happened that made them want to ban him...
759.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Donald Trump was the one saying the 2016 election had massive voter fraud. He was saying it before, after, and during that election. His words in 2016 and 2017 we're much worse in spreading distrust in the electoral system than any d
760.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
By people you don't like, you mean the people encouraging and coordinating an assault on the US capitol.
761.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I don't know much about parler, but Reddit just removed r/donaldtrump and banned the most egregious mod of r/conspiracy. It's also a much bigger site, so there are going to be more people talking on it, but they are at
762.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I'm not accusing you of anything. I just want to make sure that it's clear why proactively preventing vote fraud when there historically has been much isn't as simple as it sounds. My parents are all about voter IDs and othe
763.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
The problem is that the countermeasures people want to put in place strip people of their ability to vote legitimately. For example, voter id laws are put into place to prevent voter fraud, that you admit isn't happening, but strip te
764.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
But that's not what he's saying. He's not making any sort of transition or explanation for why people should go home. It's clearly tacked on afterwards, and the protestors know it. Then they can blame it on "the d
765.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I mean, they could also be agents, i.e., Americans acting on the behalf of a foreign power. I guarantee the Russians are at least encouraging this on social media. (Though I also believe this is predominantly a domestic problem)
766.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
This is not necessarily true. Just because we don't use as many miles of a particular transportation does not mean the economy is shrinking. Rail still makes up a huge portion of cargo transportation in the United States, we just don
767.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Some places parking ticket is revenue, some places it's just a reminder.
768.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Ironically, there was a relatively recent study showing young doctors have better outcomes than old doctors. [0] [0] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doctors-older-age-patient-morta...
769.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I think the above comment was implying that the most recent star wars movie(s) is fan fiction quality story wise... Which it was .
770.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I mean, law enforcement has a budget just like anyone else. They can't just make up money, unlike a national bank.
771.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Nation-state prevents confusing with lower level states. State is the more appropriate term, but it would cause a lot of confusion in the US.
772.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
It's been ten years. Have there been any meaningful restrictions on those rights in that time? I don't know of any.
773.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
What about people who earnestly believe that genocide is justifiable? What should YouTube do with that content? Or people advocating Euthanasia of mentally handicapped individual? I'm not saying I know a good line, but there clearly
774.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Saying that Russian hacking influenced the election is demonstrably true. Whether it caused Trump to win is not. I don't remember anyone actually saying that Trump would not have won without Russia, though I could be wrong about that
775.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
You can't say "the democrats" were claimed ng fraud. As far as I am aware, no major democrat questioned the legitimacy of the election or claimed widespread fraud. Iirc, the only notable person who claimed widespread fraud
776.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
But all of these comments are fundamentally not helpful either. They all basically boil down to calling FireEye unreliable, which is fine if you actually back it up with discussion. But that's not what they are doing. They just asser
777.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Is anyone getting the sense that there are a lot of weird comments in this thread? Why are there so many comments doubting the idea that FireEye could have been hacked by a nation state actor? It's just really weird that so many peopl
778.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
Everyone knows they are being targeted. They would have no reason to even put a press release together if they weren't breached. The first three paragraphs are basically "we are under attack" then "it's an advance
779.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
I mean, it's only over the top of it isn't true. Those are all words people have used to describe intrusions in the past, like Stuxnet or Sandworm.
780.
▲
by
enkid
6y ago
They are seeking attention by saying they got hacked, when their entire reason for existence is to defend networks?
More ›