eng2prog

4 ms·

1.
by eng2prog 6y ago
So it's not the speed like the title says? Lol
2.
by eng2prog 6y ago
Yeah I seen if you post a specific corporation name, your topic will be bombarded by some companies astroturfing. You bet every fortune 500 company has a reputation management company willing to "guide the conversation" with a few
3.
by eng2prog 6y ago
For starters let's stop using "Walled garden" as the phrasing. "Absolute dictatorship" is more like it. The users and developers are at the will of our FAANG dictators. As much as I hate Google for getting rid of se
4.
by eng2prog 6y ago
Why bother? Computing is blazing fast already. Anything that is slow should use multi threading. There's a reason most computers compromise on the processor performance, we don't need it. Take that extra few hundred and give me mo
5.
by eng2prog 6y ago
They could at significant expense. But why would they? The users don't buy for performance.
6.
by eng2prog 6y ago
I see Apple following the path of Nintendo. They don't need to compete on performance, their users aren't buying for performance. Vertical integration puts you at tremendous risk of falling behind. The future is keeping Apple &quo
7.
by eng2prog 6y ago
Today all of this is exciting, but I have a bad feeling this is going to slide Apple towards a low performance future. They Apple'd themselves and locked themselves in. In 2 years, secrets aside, Apple would need to beat all 3 big dogs
8.
by eng2prog 6y ago
Wow this really explains why it seemed like people who were at a company for ~7 years seemed like such trash. The 30 year seniors were pretty good despite their ignorance of the world outside their company. The newbies have something to pro