endothrowho333

8 ms·

31.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Cunningham and Gortler top out at MVPs -- if you base off their bios alone. Jirstrand is runner-up from all the impressive PR work she's done. Berkal: very weak maybe.
32.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
A decade of JD underground, and various other law school forums, yet there are still those that believe law school -- much less anything outside of Top 5 -- to be a worthwhile investment.
33.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Yes, to both statements. However, duplicate submissions are starting to become shadowbanned (if the intent is to manipulate SERP), while having your site link on spammy sites is simply a downrank in relevant metrics. The other corollary is
34.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Absolutely not. I'm not arrogant enough to make such a claim, and my observations tell me we all have them in one way or another. But I can say with confidence that I don't let my own problems negatively affect the people I care a
35.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
See dmwallin's sibling comment for more info. It's standard for all data, but must be enforced more strictly in social sciences where controlling for all variables (let alone knowing what they all are!) is impossible, and your cor
36.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
See page 7: https://www.valisure.com/wp-content/uploads/Valisure-Ranitid... They did NOT simulate a normal diet with common levels of sodium nitrate. At 10 mM there is no NDMA found. Sodium nitrate concentration
37.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Full disclosure: I am affiliated with myself, and represent the views of me, myself, and I. I am very biased. Me expressing my opinion, but I don't like either. So I try to steer away from expressing "my opinion," and stickin
38.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Yes, it looks pretty obvious that V@lisure is running a scare campaign to boost traffic towards their services. I wonder if there's another play at hand here, though. Did they get in a spat with suppliers? Are they trying to dump the p
39.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
It's not that you can't conclude anything from data, it's just that the things you can conclude from data are limited to only two "scientifically-sound" conclusions: >1). There is a relationship in your data
40.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Funny, you're not wrong (in two ways ;) The older I get, the more I start identifying with the "you know, a dog would probably be a lot simpler than all of this shit" crowd. However, I try not to lower my standards of life as
41.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
> Your hypothesis does not hold up to the data. Your data is not relevant to the hypothesis. The surveys were conducted in different time-frames (Canada: 2009-2014, USA 2005-2010), which I shouldn't need to tell anyone why that data
42.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
That's because OP is playing the internet marketing game (very good work, OP ;), in that world "niche" means "market vertical subset." For OP's case: > Market Vertical = Technology > Niche / Market V
43.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
I wouldn't say it's because of the hardship, but usually the side-effects of said hardship, i.e untreated emotional problems, poor mindsets towards people and relationships, very closed off emotionally -- "guarded" and f
44.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
No, because remaining polite is important. But I will make a mental note of it, and infer that said person was socialized improperly (f.e poor family life, severe bullying, inability to form strong bonds, unstable or has no non-surface rela
45.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
I'm not going to opine on this arguement, but I believe https://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=52402 is a must-read for anyone that isn't deeply involved in scientific research and writing.
46.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Curious, why would a doctor decline to use basic password auth?
47.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
If I was shooting for complete 100% accuracy: > "Phytoestrogens, through their ability to bind to all human steroid hormone receptors, exert effects on the miriad of human biological systems that rely on hormones for homeostasis, bo
48.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Go straight to the source: libgen.lc + https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Having a truly informed opinion is difficult. In the realm of biology, it requires knowing a lot of vocabulary and fundamental systems. However, once that
49.
by endothrowho333 7y ago
Hi, human endocrine researcher here: Wikipedia is garbage for "controversial" medical topics -- it's even worse for many non-controversial biochemical processes (please take a look at the human alcohol metabolism graph... utt