empath75

14 ms·

271.
by empath75 7mo ago
I'm dealing with a coworker who has wired up 3 LLM agents together into a harness and he is losing his fucking mind over it, sending me walls of texts about how it's waking up and gaining sentience and making him so much more prod
272.
by empath75 8mo ago
That was probably phrased poorly. If a robot can independently accurately do what an intelligent person would do when placed in a novel situation, then yes, I would say it is intelligent. If it's just basically being a puppet, then no
273.
by empath75 8mo ago
GPT-5.2 has been such a terrible regression that I have cancelled my OpenAI account. It's possible I might not have noticed it if Claude wasn't so much better, though.
274.
by empath75 8mo ago
No physically realizable machine is technically turing complete. But it is trivially possible to give systems-including-LLMs external storage that is accessible on demand.
275.
by empath75 8mo ago
It is impossible to accurately imitate the action of intelligent beings without being intelligent. To believe otherwise is to believe that intelligence is a vacuous property.
276.
by empath75 8mo ago
> Is it a possibility that talking to a chat bot is not any fun from a games per perspective? Lots of people "roleplay" with chatbots every day and it must be fun for them or they wouldn't do it. The problem is mostly &quo
277.
by empath75 8mo ago
The most likely situation is continuity. They just pick a new supreme leader. The second most likely situation is a civil war.
278.
by empath75 8mo ago
An app that basically reimplements a well documented and tested api is the best possible use case for ai development.
279.
by empath75 8mo ago
You are feeling that pressure because the people that use them are more productive and the next pressure you are going to get is to remove yourself from the loop completely.
280.
by empath75 8mo ago
Replace this with “writing assembly”
281.
by empath75 8mo ago
I have been laboriously going through the process of adding documentation and comments in code explaining the purpose and all the interfaces we expect and adding tests for the purpose of making it easier for claude to work with it but it al
282.
by empath75 8mo ago
But i don’t want to learn how to do that. I already know how to write code and i have built a bunch of production rust apps from scratch. I would prefer if i never have to write code. I don’t enjoy writing code, don’t take pride in having t
283.
by empath75 8mo ago
Well claude can also refine it into smaller tasks and that’s where you can fix those major problems in production issues.
284.
by empath75 8mo ago
I spent the last two weeks at work building a whole system to deploy automated claude code agents in response to events and even before i finished it was already doing useful work and now it is automatically handling jira tickets and making
285.
by empath75 8mo ago
This is not my experience with claude code. It does forget big picture things but if you scope your changes well it’s fine.
286.
by empath75 8mo ago
I think because art is usually so difficult to create that “popularity” is sort of an unstated metric that most people use to judge its quality, but ai can make disposable art for one person on demand and if doesn’t matter at all if anyone
287.
by empath75 8mo ago
Speaking of rolling your own things, i had claude knock out a trello clone for me in 30 minutes because i was irritated at atlassian. I am already using it for keeping track of personal stuff. I’m not going to make a product out of it or ev
288.
by empath75 8mo ago
"What is my purpose..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa9MpLXuLs0
289.
by empath75 8mo ago
I took 5 years of latin, a year of college french and 2 years of high school german. I can speak or read exactly zero of those languages. I have never taken a Spanish class. I spent 3 months in central america 15 years ago and even _today
290.
by empath75 8mo ago
I already built an operator so we can deploy nanoclaw agents in kubernetes with basically a single yaml file. We're already running two of them in production (PR reviews and ticket triaging)
291.
by empath75 8mo ago
It's not that it's cheating _in the market_, but if people have an obligation to their employers, etc, to keep information confidential, then they are stealing from their employer by cashing in on it, as sure as if they had taken
292.
by empath75 8mo ago
Even an O3 quality model at that speed would be incredible for a great many tasks. Not everything needs to be claude code. Imagine Apple fine tuning a mid tier reasoning model on personal assistant/MacOs/IOS sorts of tasks and b
293.
by empath75 8mo ago
100x of a less good model might be better than 1 of a better model for many many applications. This isn't ready for phones yet, but think of something like phones where people buy new ones every 3 years and even having a mediocre on-de
294.
by empath75 8mo ago
There are a lot of people here that are completely missing the point. What is it called where you look at a point of time and judge an idea without seemingly being able to imagine 5 seconds into the future.
295.
by empath75 8mo ago
Think about this for solving questions in math where you need to explore a search space. You can run 100 of these for the same cost and time of doing one api call to open ai.
296.
by empath75 8mo ago
An on-device reasoning model what that kind of speed and cost would completely change the way people use their computers. It would be closer to star trek than anything else we've ever had. You'd never have to type anything or us
297.
by empath75 8mo ago
I basically just _accidentally_ added a major new feature to one of my projects this week. In the sense that, I was trying to explain what I wanted to do to a coworker and my manager, and we kept going back and forth trying to understand th
298.
by empath75 8mo ago
I think you just have to give up ownership of the _code_ and focus on ownership of the _product_.
299.
by empath75 8mo ago
I think you have it exactly backwards, and that "owning the stack" is going to be important. Yes the harness is important, yes the model is important, but developing the harness and model together is going to pay huge dividends.
300.
by empath75 8mo ago
So here are a few things i have been thinking of: --- It's not 2 pizza teams, it's 2 people teams. You no longer need 4 people on a team just working on features off of a queue, you just need 2 people making technical decisions a

More ›