emp17344

6 ms·

61.
by emp17344 3mo ago
Because there’s no evidentiary reason to deny the existence of my own phenomenal experience. I appear to experience, and the simplest conclusion to draw from that appearance is that I truly do experience.
62.
by emp17344 3mo ago
You act as a hype peddler in practically every LLM-adjacent thread. No wonder you’re taking this article so personally. Touch grass.
63.
by emp17344 3mo ago
Yes.
64.
by emp17344 3mo ago
Guess what? SAT solvers have also solved unsolved math problems. Do you believe they are “reasoning”?
65.
by emp17344 3mo ago
Littered with AI writing tells.
66.
by emp17344 3mo ago
This is already happening. R/accelerate broke away from r/singularity because the latter wasn’t zealous enough.
67.
by emp17344 3mo ago
Way too many rationalist-adjacent cultists here who worship Yudkowsky as a prophet.
68.
by emp17344 3mo ago
This is really only meaningful if AI imparts knowledge beyond what you could learn from a simple Google search. It’s not clear that this is the case.
69.
by emp17344 3mo ago
This isn’t really how it works anymore. Agents rely heavily on tool use and the agentic harness to perform tasks. Pre-training is no longer very effective.
70.
by emp17344 3mo ago
My god. It’s useful for coding… and that’s it. It’s not going to change the world the way you think.
71.
by emp17344 3mo ago
Another day, another bullshit paper released by Anthropic without peer review implying LLMs are alive.
72.
by emp17344 3mo ago
I think the “unlock” is that AI firms were given trillions of dollars to discover new techniques. In fact, there are very few industries where a sudden influx of that much money would not lead to rapid advancements. It’s not really unique t
73.
by emp17344 4mo ago
If you think you can outright reject one of the most famous arguments in philosophy of mind with a semantic quibble, you should think again.
74.
by emp17344 4mo ago
I mean, a quick Google search shows that the web is absolutely inundated with articles and how-to guides on turning guitar hero controllers into MIDI controllers. It seems like a pretty common project.
75.
by emp17344 4mo ago
Always an excuse, huh? Both mean and median wages are up. Sorry this doesn’t suit your narrative.
76.
by emp17344 4mo ago
What do you mean the article lacks data? Did you miss the BLS report?
77.
by emp17344 4mo ago
If you’re so confident, show us some data to debunk the article. You have a weird chip on shoulder, but no economic evidence to justify it.
78.
by emp17344 4mo ago
This is - quite literally - the fixed-pie fallacy, which has been thoroughly debunked by now. Read up on basic economics before commenting on this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy
79.
by emp17344 4mo ago
Yeah, right. If this benchmark was truly developed in an independent manner, and the timing just “lined up”, how did Anthropic even know to include results in their model release documentation the day after the benchmark is revealed? It see
80.
by emp17344 4mo ago
Seems like it literally popped up yesterday with the express purpose of building hype for this release.
81.
by emp17344 4mo ago
This is extremely inflammatory. It’s like you’re trying to start a fight. You’re actively degrading the quality of the discussion.
82.
by emp17344 4mo ago
Some of it is TESCREAL ideology. Tech circles have been inundated with quasi-religious belief surrounding AI for most of the 21st century, which then biases tech enthusiasts towards extremist positions on LLMs.
83.
by emp17344 4mo ago
Not if you’re claiming that the spells, once cast, automatically get exponentially spellier until they awaken into a spell god, capable of literally anything, including casting more complicated spells than any wizard is capable of. If that
84.
by emp17344 4mo ago
The issue is he’s not actually balanced at all. I’ve never seen him say anything negative about an AI product.
85.
by emp17344 5mo ago
Some folks are absolutely giddy about using AI as a cudgel to dehumanize others. Those people are idiots.
86.
by emp17344 5mo ago
RLVR doesn’t work for unverifiable tasks, so they won’t be able to effectively use tools to boost reliability for those tasks.
87.
by emp17344 5mo ago
If it’s not easily verifiable, LLMs aren’t good at it.
88.
by emp17344 5mo ago
There is now a trillion-dollar industry bent to the task of convincing people these things can think. It’s gonna cause some damage.
89.
by emp17344 5mo ago
Why is there always an identical reply like this when anyone criticizes LLMs?
90.
by emp17344 5mo ago
This is an obvious bot. I hate this crap.

More ›