emilypyqai

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by emilypyqai 4y ago

   (great article too btw)
2. 2.▲
   by emilypyqai 4y ago

   Yeah super fair, agreed that general-purpose handling will rarely (if ever) beat a specifically dedicated team - anything specific and critical will still require custom work. That being said, we think that there are some straightforward ap
3. 3.▲
   by emilypyqai 4y ago

   we are HUGELY grateful for those companies - would've taken us so much longer to get off the ground without them
4. 4.▲
   by emilypyqai 4y ago

   Ooh yes that would be really cool - we experimented a bit with code generation, but found that it was a bit unreliable and fiddly since it required such precise prompting. Certainly something we'd like to expand into in the future, th
5. 5.▲
   by emilypyqai 4y ago

   Agreed that the OpenAI API is pretty easy to use. But to have a model perform a specific task involves more than just calling the API - you have to manage prompts, finite context windows, and integrations with other APIs. We use GPT under t
6. 6.▲
   by emilypyqai 4y ago

   We are fairly similar, but we provide model hosting, and also are focused on a more narrow band of AI tasks, including image generation for blogs, stock photos, and events.