ellisdewalt

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ellisdewalt 10y ago

   The lenses aren't anything near that of a gopro. Name an app company that has gotten distribution of a hardware product. If anything, the goal of this article is simply to have 3rd parties clone this idea.
2. 2.▲
   by ellisdewalt 10y ago

   -Nobody else knows that. -That means they can't be used more than half the time. -No, I'm not.
3. 3.▲
   by ellisdewalt 10y ago

   Not sure how it's brilliant. Secondly, it still suffers from that fact that literally everyone is creeped out by a rando staring at them with two cameras. At least a phone is halfway obvious when in use.
4. 4.▲
   by ellisdewalt 10y ago

   Essentially agree 100%. My minor nitpic is that while I'm willing to be cynical almost whole hog including your examples, we even have similar examples that are more dumb and less insidious than yours. E.g, truffles vs mushrooms in th
5. 5.▲
   by ellisdewalt 10y ago

   Both you and eropple are spot on. I would have admitted both of your points but I'm not as knowledgeable. The issue is, might_atomic says he is cynical that the reason the law is the case isn't dumb, it's intentional. If we
6. 6.▲
   by ellisdewalt 10y ago

   It's dumb because even if they wanted to have that severe of a punishment for LSD specifically, they could do math and just make the sentence greater for smaller amounts of actual drug. Be as cynical as you like, but we'd see equ