elicash

27 ms·

391.
by elicash 3y ago
I of course didn't argue that his speech can't be restrained. I think there are limits, as you do. We just disagree over where the line should be drawn. Certainly you agree he has some right to talk about the case, when it's
392.
by elicash 3y ago
Your response doesn't contradict anything I wrote. I wrote that the judge was correct in sending him to jail for witness intimidation because they should apply the same standard they do in every other case. I just don't like the s
393.
by elicash 3y ago
It's certainly true that prosecutors love when defendants keep talking publicly about the case. It makes their job much easier.
394.
by elicash 3y ago
I think the standard way our justice system treats defending yourself publicly as witness intimidation is faulty. In the previous instance, his talking to journalists should be protected first amendment activities. And then later, with the
395.
by elicash 3y ago
There is also networked geothermal https://heet.org/geo/
396.
by elicash 3y ago
Update, force close the app, then touch the main logo once you're back in.
397.
by elicash 3y ago
That launched like a day or two ago -- though it doesn't remember your last setting and is hard to find.
398.
by elicash 3y ago
They have already said it's in the works.
399.
by elicash 3y ago
I think, in retrospect, they made a mistake in launching quickly before having core features. There was a desire to capitalize on twitter technical issues. > Mr Zuckerberg [...] described the situation as "normal" and said he a
400.
by elicash 3y ago
Before reading the piece I thought you were being dismissive and rude. But no, it's genuinely unclear. "Customers must think you are superhuman." "Create arbitrary rules and rituals." "Become a caricature of yo
401.
by elicash 3y ago
I know nothing about helicopters, but just from driving a car I'd imagine there are a variety of ways the pedal can jam even without something falling in that space. Does a helicopter have an equivalent of shifting your car into neutra
402.
by elicash 3y ago
> ...their content will become effectively invisible [0] That link you cited says they won't "discourage or down-rank news or politics." It's the exact opposite of what you said it said. They might change their mind,
403.
by elicash 3y ago
I dated somebody long ago who did this in her spare time. She did this at her own expense because she loves cats. So that's why she wouldn't kill them. I'd imagine this is common.
404.
by elicash 3y ago
No it isn't. The article brings up the term about halfway into the article and immediately say it was "first developed in England in the 1950s." This is right before they even define what TNR is! Then they immediately go into
405.
by elicash 3y ago
I don't think there's much harm. If they ever get to a point where it's reliably better than ChatGPT, they could just call it something else other than "Bard" and erase the negative branding associated with it. (If
406.
by elicash 3y ago
In the keynote, they went out of their way to say that they won't give this data to websites, only click data. This, of course, is different. To the extent they can prevent it, they will. But I'm not sure what data app developers
407.
by elicash 3y ago
I use ghost and have had a good experience, but more competition is great.
408.
by elicash 3y ago
In the original video, he says he needs the wall to achieve the looping effect. But in this case, what's the reason it seems to need to be indoor, or within some kind of booth?
409.
by elicash 3y ago
I was expecting a piece on Harlan Crow
410.
by elicash 3y ago
A couple weeks ago ago, I looked into building it for iPhone, but there was no way in iOS to integrate it. So now I'm just hoping for Apple to do it. This article was what prompted the thought: https://www.washingtonpost.com
411.
by elicash 3y ago
Genuinely funny reply. But (a) whether I prefer typing or speaking, and (b) whether I prefer reading or hearing, is very context-dependent and might not be the same for the person at the other end -- and so yeah I think having flexibility t
412.
by elicash 3y ago
It's not necessarily the only solution, just the one Apple has started with. My guess is that at least in part there are technical reasons, since even this structured approach will require overnight processing (source: WaPo) by Apple.
413.
by elicash 3y ago
I'm not the target audience for these features, and don't want to speculate on behalf of others, so I'll just focus on my own needs... Live Speech: I actually answer unknown phone numbers (usually) and would like text-to-spee
414.
by elicash 3y ago
Last year I had lots of investments that I hadn’t previously. This year I sold a home. Next year, I’m planning to get married. The year after that, a new home? Maybe these are “drastic” changes but they aren’t unusual across the population.
415.
by elicash 3y ago
I suggested in my comment that they might!
416.
by elicash 3y ago
I know I'm likely better off with the standard deduction, but I still have to check both ways to know for sure that's the case for me. So standard deduction never actually saves me time even though post Trump tax reform I generall
417.
by elicash 3y ago
Does that work when the percent you're supposed to pay depends on income bracket? (Genuine question!)
418.
by elicash 3y ago
Would you prefer to pay even more for somebody filing by paper? That's our current system. You can pay nothing to file, but it means that the government then has to spend a ton of resources on managing pieces of paper. I'd prefer
419.
by elicash 3y ago
It would save taxpayer dollars if we encourage folks filing by paper to do so electronically. Administratively, having the agency staff folks dealing with paper takes much longer.
420.
by elicash 3y ago
That might be true later! But so far: "The system was developed by the IRS and U.S. Digital Service, the White House’s technology consulting agency." You can learn more about the U.S. Digital Service here: https://www.u

More ›