elgatito

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   Yeah, the discussion was never about acoustic couplers nor about gigabit connections. And on "regular" connections, the newer HTTP versions do not perform better than HTTP 1.1. But again, why are you replying if we already agreed
2. 2.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   Thanks for the test, these rather very close values reflect my experience as well. While my Internet connection is actually based on a mobile connection, it's still difficult for me to comment how a classic smartphone may behave, as th
3. 3.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   Who ever mentioned wired gigabit Ethernet? Please elaborate.
4. 4.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   I am afraid I am not sure what you are saying. Noticeable is relevant. Either it is noticable faster or it isn't. In my experience it isn't, hence the question. If you can convince me with a site where one can actually notice that
5. 5.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   Thanks for the example. Though, Youtube was definitely one of the sites I visited. I just ran a test with HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 3 - and in both cases, it took about 10 seconds until the whole page was loaded. It was already usable earlier than
6. 6.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   Would you have a site where that can be reproduced? While I am not saying it might be to some extent subjective, I cannot say I have noticed anything noticably different between and 1.1 and 2 or 3. For that reason I'd be curious on whi
7. 7.▲
   by elgatito 3y ago

   Thanks, but did you personally experience noticable better request times with the newer versions?
8. 8.▲
   Ask HN: Convince Me of HTTP 2

   14 points by elgatito 3y ago|32 comments