elevader

11 ms·

61.
by elevader 5y ago
I feel like this isn't really framing the issue fairly. The issue isn't that Sony couldn't use GPL code, there is no law preventing them from doing so, they just choose not to (for a variety of reasons, I'd imagine). Jus
62.
by elevader 5y ago
I'd guess that most simply don't care as this is really just an issue for the company, not the author. If the project is licensed with MIT/BSD it still isn't really likely that the company will contribute/donate&#x2
63.
by elevader 6y ago
It's true that reputation and trust matter - at least they should. I guess it comes down to the question if a large enough portion of consumers actually know and care about this stuff and would be willing to reward a more open/hon
64.
by elevader 6y ago
They most likely can't but reviewers basically depend on the goodwill of the publishers in order to get pre-release copies for early reviews. If they don't get them they will simply loose out on money (reviewing the game 1-2 weeks
65.
by elevader 6y ago
Which is nice (and very true) but hardly useful when all you want is to look at some actually used lisp code. Emacs might be a good candidate for that.
66.
by elevader 6y ago
Maybe, but at the same time it seems like the best option for general language support in emacs. A lot of languages have working lsp implementations (at least according to https://langserver.org/ ) and, assuming it will stic
67.
by elevader 6y ago
I don't do a lot of java development but https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-java works really well for me.
68.
by elevader 6y ago
I guess that depends on the definition of "complete". Games back then tended to ship with whole features simply not working. The already mentioned Final Fantasy series comes to mind, I think Diablo 2 shipped with a Holy Fire Aura
69.
by elevader 7y ago
Yes, exactly. This code basically runs at compile time and creates functions that return static results. This case doesn't have to be wrapped inside of the quote thing (I'm not even sure if it would compile if you did...), which i
70.
by elevader 7y ago
The unquote in your code example doesn't necessarily need to be unquoted, it would be enough to unquote the codepoint variable here. The point, I guess, is about at what point you want to evaluate the code. There is a great little fu