eleh

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by eleh 11y ago

   There are such projects already, even started long before the NPAPI discussion: http://kmeleonbrowser.org/ http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
2. 2.▲
   by eleh 11y ago

   > That would be asinine. No, absolutely not. That would mark a real position, and maintain a competitive advantage for Mozilla in enterprise environments (where browsers are used for more than playing games and watching videos, and plugi
3. 3.▲
   by eleh 11y ago

   > I'd be curious how they are planning to support extensions like vimperator or even no-script. That will not be supported anymore. Regardless of the user's desires. They want you to consume media and buy their apps in the brow
4. 4.▲
   by eleh 11y ago

   > OTOH, maybe this is a win. We need to get away from this > whole "The browser is a poor man's operating system" model > anyway. Let the browser do a great job of browsing > hypermedia Yes that is the only win I
5. 5.▲
   by eleh 11y ago

   Interresting project :). Every project in this direction is thriving and fun, no doubt. I am happy to see these developments, hopefully they go on! The browser plugin on the other side is mature and fits in where EmTcl, NaTcl etc. leave off
6. 6.▲
   by eleh 11y ago

   Depends. Lets say you have a service that is running on your local PC at some port >1024. It uses a special binary TCP protocol and controls hardware from which images are coming in live stream. You want to display these images in a brow