ejbam

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ejbam 7y ago

   >Unless you like low-latency video chats. Or online gaming. Or VPNs. Or reliability. Or remote desktop. I have all of that with CGNAT. >Fundamentally, TCP won't allow more than 64K connections from one IP to a single port on anot
2. 2.▲
   by ejbam 7y ago

   I think it's perfectly functional for end users. In fact, I've been behind a triple NAT for years (CGNAT + 2 routers at home) and I have no problems at all. This is not 1995 when you needed to connect to other users of the Interne
3. 3.▲
   by ejbam 7y ago

   I've been behind a CGNAT for years and I haven't had a single problem, perhaps your problems lied with something else?
4. 4.▲
   by ejbam 7y ago

   We ran out of IPv4 addresses again. How many times has this happened this past decade? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2174992 9y https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4480532 7y Looking forward to the
5. 5.▲
   by ejbam 7y ago

   https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wasserstra%C3%9F... (Also check out the subcategories)