Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eivarv
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
361.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Yeah, that's what I'm talking about.
362.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
FYI: Sublime Text's plugin API has recently (v. 3118) been updated with some cool new features relating to inline minihtml, which makes something like this more feasible. While it doesn't currently exist, someone might implement s
363.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Not OP, but I've had good experiences with LaTeXTools[1]. [1]: https://packagecontrol.io/packages/LaTeXTools
364.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
No, we really don't. What we know is what has happened in "nature", and while we can try to extrapolate from that, we really have no clue as to what is possible. Even though you grossly exaggerate how genes work with regard
365.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
It is. I see it more like someone saying (to stick with your example): "Don't buy iPhones - they'll kill you!", and scientists answering "But they're totally safe, they won't kill you." Meanwhile, the
366.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Sure - it is the current situation to some extent. But I think would be solvable via regulation, not to mention that this is a different discussion entirely. I don't think they are necessarily behaving in an irresponsible way, though.
367.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Why does it matter what would or wouldn't happen "naturally", though?
368.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
How is "privatising/patenting seeds" synonymous with "G.M.O. Foods"? The Nobel Laureates are not talking about the business-practice of certain companies, but rather about fear-mongering about G.M.O.s themselves, e.
369.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
The data retention directive was also pretty controversial.
370.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Not OP, but what about Aboriginal Australians?
371.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
I don't think that's right, as the techniques are still called machine learning. Though the distinction between the terms "machine learning" and "artificial intelligence" is somewhat unclear (depending on usage
372.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
If so, the UK is different from mainland Europe in this regard. I do find it peculiar, though, that "neo-liberalism" is of a different form than "liberalism", and hence not really "new liberalism":P
373.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Generally, when people say "liberal" in Europe they mean "economically liberal", while people mean "socially liberal" in the US.
374.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
I'd argue that this is because "natural" and "unnatural" or "artificial" are poorly defined (and usually useless) terms.
375.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Yes, but they're not different points on a scale that goes from religious to irreligious, if that is what you mean. One can be an agnostic christian, for instance, in which case one would believe that it is unknown or unknowable whethe
376.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
Agnosticism is the stance that what we are talking about is unknowable, as opposed to gnosticism. I think what you refer to as atheism seems closer to antitheism than anything else. The difference here is the same as the difference between
377.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
What sysk is saying that atheism is not the belief that no god exists, but rather the lack of a belief in a god. It's also not as if any two unsubstantiated and unprovable positions are just as likely to be true; see Russell's te
378.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
This has been my experience as well, in addition to an increase in energy use.
379.
▲
by
eivarv
10y ago
I'd point out the poor validity and unreliability of Myers-Briggs, but it would perhaps prove your larger point.
380.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
Do you have any sources re: GSM networks being "harmful to bees and other insects"? The results [0-3] of a quick Google search suggests that it's not the case, and I couldn't find any research claiming it either (though,
381.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
The results referenced in the article can be found here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.15252/emmm.201505894/f...
382.
▲
Gene mutations pointing toward Alzheimer solution – VG [translation]
(translate.google.com)
1 points
by
eivarv
11y ago
|
1 comments
383.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
You've identified a correlation. What solipsism is objecting to ("big claim"/"hypothesis") is the statement "There's a reason for that", which implies that there's a causal relationship betw
384.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
While not open journals per se, many (new) papers will typically be available at academic homepages (preprints), via "All [X] versions"-links in a google scholar [0] search, or on arXiv [1], depending on the subfield. For instance
385.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
According to the rules [0], "Show HN is a way to share something that you've made". Cool site, though. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
386.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
Relevant research by the scientist in the article (Tone Elise Gjøtterud Henriksen): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264124
387.
▲
Orange glasses may be the solution for bipolar – NRK
(translate.google.com)
1 points
by
eivarv
11y ago
|
1 comments
388.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
First: What do you mean when you talk about Stoicism working - What do you think is the goal of Stoicism? Second: This criticism is applicable to just about anything; does capitalism not "work" since just about any implementation
389.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
Whether or not Seneca behaved consistently with the ideals of stoicism doesn't really say anything about how well stoicism "works" [0]. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
390.
▲
by
eivarv
11y ago
Obligatory mention of Betteridge's law of headlines [0]. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
More ›