Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eitland
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
901.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
> What more do we need? Good languages with good IDE support? I'm old enough that at some point assembly and C were my favourite languages and PHP was what I was most productive in and Python was also something I enjoy. These days n
902.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
That's interesting and useful to know and I decide to believe you. BTW: Yes, I absolutely noticed that you said this above: > ...and the beauty of the Internet is that there's really no way to be sure people are being genuine..
903.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
This sounds brilliant and I see no immediate reason why something like this shouldn't be useful for most software ecosystems. Also, in addition to the pure security perspective of this I also have a feeling that it might become a usefu
904.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
If you live in EU or EEC I wonder if this isn't covered by GDPR? Aren't companies required to have a way to get a manual review of anything an AI does? And aren't they also to safeguard your data? I'm not a GDPR expert b
905.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Long time Firefox user and HNer here. I've at least been "captchaed" in Firefox. While being logged in with my Gmail account from 2005.
906.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
> The thing I'm most confused about is why Signal and Telegram are always seen as competing. Well, this is a good question. Telegram is an allround day-to-day messenger with channels, massive groups, broadcasts etc that also works a
907.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Ok, now I see. I actually agree with that point. I'd like to mention though that one model I really liked was what the one that Google landed on with Google+: a central identity only known to one entity and then as many pseudonyms as y
908.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
> Discord has a centralized profile system built around gamer culture and the idea of using a “handle” that is rightly disconnected from your identity. You make it sound like this is a bad thing? Letting people use handles has been a thi
909.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Works most of the time on my Firefox on Windows and Linux I think.
910.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Well, you can do as I do and work for a company that is owned by the employees. I have plenty to say about were I work as long as there is a good opportunity and if there are none that our sales team can find I wouldn't have found them
911.
▲
What is going on with the search results?(2013)
(techinorg.blogspot.com)
1 points
by
eitland
5y ago
|
0 comments
912.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Ok, so I had to dig out an old blog post: https://techinorg.blogspot.com/2010/04/swithing-to-mac-one-y... So it wasn't jumping between words it was home/end.
913.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
The things I remember using for work back then was eclipse, Textedit(not sure about the name, but at least the simple text editor that came with Mac), Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
914.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Sounds older than what I worked on, one of the beloved (by Mac fans) 2009 Macbook Pros.
915.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Seems I am not alone. I have recently started to use it for personal things though, but again just things that I can use all the time in the world for. I tried installing a dev environment on it and it was instant frustration.
916.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Thanks, this might come in useful at some point. That said, on Windows and in Linux this is extremely much simpler and more consistent, I can write it down right here and now, it doesn't need a full web page: arrow keys: move ctrl + ar
917.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
> and be as consistent as my old Macs. Would it help if I point out that this is just rose tinted glasses? ;-) Or at least, when I used Mac full time back in 2009 - 2012, it was the least consistent thing I ever used: even such basic sho
918.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Mac differs between switching windows and applications. So if you work in an IDE, keep reading docs in one Firefox window and test your application in another Firefox window then in KDE or XFCE or another sane windowing system[1] - even Win
919.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
We had a somewhat beloved chatbot at work, but we are of course a consulting company. And it is gone now and replaced with a much more effective app, my point is just that it clearly possible to make chatbots that aren't rage inducing.
920.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
See also the answer from mindcrime. There's also one very important difference between those two: - others can see your favourites. - you can see both your upvotes and your favourites so only use favourites for things you don't wo
921.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
You pretend these are equal: Well, they are not. There is a good deal over a century between those two events and a whole lot has changed since then - even though I should admit not as much as I want. Russias aggression against Ukraine howe
922.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
> funny enough a lot of them are originated from the KDE community. How is that funny?
923.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Ok, so pretty good proof that racket is a working programming language programming language then :-)
924.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
I thought that was Arc?
925.
▲
Why we choose profit
(m.signalvnoise.com)
2 points
by
eitland
5y ago
|
0 comments
926.
▲
Chrome is the new Internet Explorer – 4 stages
(erik.itland.no)
2 points
by
eitland
5y ago
|
0 comments
927.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
That was a longer list than I expected, thanks for putting in the effort and also for your nuanced position. I'm one of those who enjoy the PDF reader FWIW, same with push notifications. The PDF reader in particular because I almost ha
928.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
Agree to a large degree, but this: > Bloat and feature creep are real (and I'd accuse Firefox of both) but in general yes[...] Except Pocket, what particular new bloat has Firefox added over the last decade? I am not too fond of Moz
929.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
> but for almost the entire decade prior Firefox was unstable trash. People say this all the time. Personally I didn't like Chrome for UX and technical reasons even back when Google were nice so I have used Firefox from 2005 until n
930.
▲
by
eitland
5y ago
No software I can think of has been ruined for me because of getting too advanced. To particular pieces of software has lost a lot of their utility for me thanks to dumbification: - Google I have now given up. It was equally dumb as DDG w
More ›