Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eganist
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
The stats here on carjacking are so bad that I just avoid taking my car places that show nasty trends on https://crimecards.dc.gov Example: https://crimecards.dc.gov/stolen%20autos:property%20crimes/a...
62.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> The Nasdaq is in an A.I.-led bubble This^^ title is editorialized and possibly deliberately misleading. Article ends with: > I will start working on a piece that will assess whether the NASDAQ (primarily) and hence passive investing
63.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Niagara splits into two columns for all of its lists. Otherwise the experience is the same, and it's really clean.
64.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Niagara on the Fold is a wonderful pairing honestly.
65.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Is there a paid version without ads? Or all the tracking in the permissions?
66.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
OP already mentioned that it adds additional hurdles for possible future tech giants to have to cross on their quest. It's akin to a Great Filter, if such an analogy helps. If Meta's open models make a company's closed models
67.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> What are we trying to find or learn that life from earth will permanently remove the chance of? Species prove to be invasive all the time on earth when exposed to new ecosystems or environments, and usually that's at the expense o
68.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
There's no real redefinition here.
69.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> Riot is offering a minumum of six months of severance. [...] It's important that people are treated with dignity and a financial cushion, and at least according to this blog post that seems to be the case. It wouldn't surpris
70.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> A more literal interpretation of accountability would mean that they can tell the story, the accounting, of how things happened. That's not a common interpretation in this context, especially the part about responsibility v. acco
71.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
It's a decent severance package, honestly. But, as usual, > As CEO, I’m accountable for the changes we’re making and where we’re headed in the future. So, I think it’s important for me to share how we got here and how the next few d
72.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
If this is true, then this is probably a great ruling for JetBlue; they can buy up the scraps at bankruptcy if Spirit liquidates.
73.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Possibly, but it's not as abrupt and obvious as with JetBlue/Spirit, who both compete in the exact same market in modestly different ways. Alaska and Hawaiian have limited regional overlap with flights from certain west coast citi
74.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
I'm probably oversimplifying, but Alaska + Hawaiian creates a larger regional competitor to e.g American, United, and Southwest on a more local scale where most of their routes are complimentary (the two weren't substantially comp
75.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
A much more interesting link is between crime and atmospheric lead emissions, which looks similar to this but conforms much more tightly. I'm more inclined to buy that than interest rates considering we have more direct evidence betwee
76.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
probably, but you can try getting a refund first. If they refuse, charge it back, cite this article.
77.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> why not simply assume I'm mis-informed but in good faith, and correct me ? In the absence of information I would've done just that, but I had a look at your comment history first before I replied. lol Happy to have been helpf
78.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Were they? I thought boeing was self certifying elements of the MAX like the door plugs, do you have something showing the FAA inspected the door plugs? Everything I'm reading says the FAA is moving to divorce the certification process
79.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
I'm not sure that this merits the same kind of discussion that the MAX situation is garnering yet. Cracks happen, there doesn't seem to be a systemic issue, it was in one of four layers of glass (the outermost), and the plane la
80.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
This is one of those questions that reads as being in bad faith on its face, but it has a good answer to it. https://www.oig.dot.gov/agency/federal-aviation-administrati... In the US, the major executive departments ha
81.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
The replies beneath you are likely wildly off base if the other end of the phone call was based in a two party consent state like California. If both ends of the call were in Virginia or another one party consent state, the recording is pro
82.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> I think your use of the word "individual" is a bit weird here. I absolutely find it likely that OpenAI is doing individualized manipulation against everyone who uses their systems. Maybe this would be more obvious if you repl
83.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
I need data on that. I haven't seen that in practice.
84.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Converging threads here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38956734 tldr: power (or if you want, impact) is the linear dimension, likelihood adds a second dimension to the plane of trust.
85.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
You're assuming power comes with an assumed guarantee of use. OpenAI has vast amounts of power with the data they're collecting, but the likelihood of OpenAI using it against any individual is small enough that an individual could
86.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> If you don't want your family to know something, you shouldn't tell it to OpenAI either. Yeah, I think this is an over reduction of personal privacy models, but can you tell me why you believe this?
87.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> Quite the opposite actually. My intent is to shed light on the fact that sharing information with OpenAI is not private. And you should not do that with information that you wouldn't even share with people you trust. I'm not
88.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> Worked at a 10k+ US company. Executive swore at me. Threatened to fire me. Did HR give a fuck? No. I did what I could, in my position, to protect my job. I had my own manager join the call early on (was a 15 minute "heated" d
89.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
Or legitimate claims, which is likely the deciding factor behind apple doubling down. Apple should lose this, if only to minimize the deterrent effect so that others know they can prevail with legitimate claims.
90.
▲
by
eganist
3y ago
> principled views about things. Selfishly* principled. There's no exclusively abstract benefit here the way there is with e.g privacy rights; there's both the benefit of not having to pay royalties if they prevail as well as t
More ›