eftychis

7 ms·

31.
by eftychis 2y ago
Two comments, directed to the majority of discussions: a) It is ironic and indefensible how a company known for storing and gathering the world's information, engages directly in a massive evidence spoliation strategy in direct violati
32.
by eftychis 2y ago
Yes, and it can actually backfire, by opening the floodgates to all communications. (As you lose all credibility after some point.) You are just betting nobody is going to keep digging.
33.
by eftychis 2y ago
There is a difference between keeping one's privacy and actively abusing and masquerading attorney client privilege to conceal criminal actions, knowing they are criminal actions. Because that is what Google was doing. They knew extrem
34.
by eftychis 2y ago
As the sibling comment noted, you were within the legal prescribed boundaries. The flag is automatic if something is off. No person (I think/in general/most countries) sits and counts days. The computer does. In fact if they note
35.
by eftychis 2y ago
I am not sure what you mean by "never used as is." The Kelly criterion is an optimization of capital growth (its logarithm) method/guide. Not using it doesn't change its correctness. But yes you need to know the advantag
36.
by eftychis 2y ago
Seconded. This could have been essentially anything and everything else bunched together. Or we have a compiler or debug symbol bug in our hands.
37.
by eftychis 2y ago
You mean the interest free loan they asked for? They are just waiting for it to double, so give it another 5 years. /s Seriously, though, this is the standard Elon Musk tactic...
38.
by eftychis 2y ago
The whole point was to please future shareholders.
39.
by eftychis 2y ago
Let me rephrase my answer: FTX made a good number in the double digits of investments and acquisitions. ( https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/ftx-exchange/recent_... ) I believe Anthropic was the most acclaimed&
40.
by eftychis 2y ago
I am not sure. I don't think so but I haven't had time to read how the equities will get liquidated.
41.
by eftychis 2y ago
The statement is misleading. People are making 18% interest on the value of Bitcoin et al. at the value of 2022, which is less than $20k. Now that is $60k, back to the value levels of 2021. Thus, the only reason there is interest is that th
42.
by eftychis 2y ago
Way way too low of a sentence. The only upside here is it keeps crime bosses in a constant panic on when inevitably one of their underlings is going to pick the two year sentence exit door and bring everything down. Hopefully, this will lea
43.
by eftychis 2y ago
No contract clause can protect you from a gross negligence tort. (Or equivalent in one's respective civil law system.) This might be the easiest gross negligence tort case to show and litigate-- still hard but if everyone starts the la
44.
by eftychis 2y ago
I guess this site is using Linux or BSD and they had to venture outside their usual modus operandi to DMCA... /s
45.
by eftychis 2y ago
Not unheard of for some crimes, eg drugs or money laundering. Securities fraud also essentially offers that: all money made out of the fraud and gains on that belong to the victims. California's Unfair Competition framework also dictat
46.
by eftychis 2y ago
Equitable and more specifically injunctive relief is the way out of this abuse of "crime is the cost of doing business" mentality. (That a lot of us raise here.) What could that mean: Meta or whichever company breaks the law, lose
47.
by eftychis 2y ago
Not a stupid question at all. I agree with you. But that is part of the style of VLDB -- the front matter has the publication date. In any case this is part of the 2022-2023 volume: https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/volumes&#x
48.
by eftychis 2y ago
Adding to the sibling comments: First: every human is per se doing that already. We have – to handwave – a "reasonable person" bar to separate violations versus results of learning and new innovation. Second: You can be a holder
49.
by eftychis 2y ago
If it is vital to national security -- not disagreeing there -- it is paramount for everything and everyone to be investigated. You want the defense of NATO and the U.S. to be in the hands of people that can not deliver a plane? Time for he
50.
by eftychis 2y ago
I respectfully disagree with the author's title choice. My first impression is, of course, that the issue is there is no production Game or GUI framework around. The author seems to complain mainly about the choices of frameworks and h
51.
by eftychis 2y ago
This can't be stated enough. They could not get away with it. Otherwise, they would. There is little to no competition in the segment. And that must change.
52.
by eftychis 3y ago
Yes. I was touching solely the likely unique characteristics of prostate cancer. Maybe I need to clarify, but that is what I got the comment I was replying to indicated.
53.
by eftychis 3y ago
I think this is unique to prostate cancer. As it says the average age of men getting it is 67. From experience and from data I had seen, a lot of times, the surgeons simply believe the patient is too old to have any surgery. And when they d
54.
by eftychis 3y ago
The line that stands out, down the line, that I think people miss in the comments: "But the agency never paid for it [the server]."
55.
by eftychis 3y ago
Anecdotal story/take: The Aegean Airlines (Europe) business seat has much, much better food in a 20-minute flight than the comparable business 5-7-hour flight in the U.S. (And for a lower price, but I'm not sure that is important
56.
by eftychis 3y ago
Perhaps even before the dissolution. But the science and IP become public and open or under a non-profit that is tasked with opening them. And for-profit segments are stripped of any exclusive rights that arose from the OpenAI. The irony is
57.
by eftychis 3y ago
Reading the messages: This is a marketing step of course, no sane lawyer would agree to this. And that is because, I don't think they show what they think and want to show. That at some point Elon had an opinion that a lot of money is
58.
by eftychis 3y ago
In my eyes this is a straw argument. "[T]otally OK not to share the science." I think the reasonable average person would disagree with that. And, it would go against certain goal & financial transparency principles that the I
59.
by eftychis 3y ago
Corporations definitely count as legal persons, with obligations and rights. This gave us the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310, i case on their right to speech or place funds.
60.
by eftychis 3y ago
The mistake Google has done here is that it deploys and launches and uses to garner attention projects under it's name. There is little to no, this is an experimental project by x team. It is this is a Google product. If everything is

More ›