Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
efdee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
efdee
11mo ago
C# had async/await long before Javascript/node. Not that big a revelation ;-)
32.
▲
by
efdee
11mo ago
The people destroying the seeds are not the ones building the vaults.
33.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Nowhere does anyone claim that "let's go" means "you should let us go". The discussion was whether "let us go" automatically means "you should let us go", which it does not.
34.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Maybe as far as you are concerned, but not as far as the law is concerned ;-)
35.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
You can't always replace "let us" with "let's", but you can always replace "let's" with "let us".
36.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
"Let us go" does not only mean "you should let us go" but it is also the first person plural imperative implying that we go. Whether you shorten it to "let's go" or not does not change this. Same as how &q
37.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Let literally means a lot of things, one of them being "allow us to". But that is only one of many of its literal meanings.
38.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
True, but the point was not that they were asking permission, it's the "let us do this together" meaning to which the OP takes offense. He feels like it implies he cannot do it on his own.
39.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
You have a point. But on the other hand you have no idea of what tools the intruder possesses, only (at best!) what they used. I think intent probably matters a lot more than the technicality of how you succeeded.
40.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Breaking in in a system, whether or not the password was easy to guess, sounds like a crime to me.
41.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
I can't think of any situation where "let's" does not mean "let us"?
42.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Same for Explorer, really. The SMB hosts that announce themselves show up in the sidebar.
43.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
But what if we hire nine women instead of just one?
44.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
I think you're confusing Microsoft and Apple. :-)
45.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
I used to, but I don't consume enough YouTube videos anymore to make it worthwhile. Give me a top-up plan that I can use to pay for individual videos and I will definitely do it. But what's with the weirdly aggressive second part
46.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Weird. I'm pretty sure that deciding whether or not to watch ads is entirely my choice.
47.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
I'm very much willing to pay for their content, but not in the way of watching ads during the videos.
48.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
From the same rules: "Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it. Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead. If you flag, please don't also comme
49.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
But not having to dual boot and just get both worlds at the same time definitely beats having to dual boot.
50.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
What marketing?
51.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
They didn't "forget" to lock the door that one time. They just never lock it. The guy yelling it out loud is pissing off all the people who already knew you didn't. He is not the one to be angry at.
52.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Remind me what the 30% markup is for, again?
53.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Strange wording. You are the one that put tens of thousands of your users at risk. Not the one who discovers the problem.
54.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Like you say: "for better or worse". FWIW, I haven't ran antivirus software on Windows (other than the included Defender, but that's not something I think about) in literally decades.
55.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
What are you saying here, though? That Microsoft should have the monopoly on deciding what software is safe and what is not?
56.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
THANK YOU.
57.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
> I had to run a debloater on my system Hot take: your ""debloater"" screwed up your system. I've had problems with Windows, but none of the ones you've described. > For the average user this experience s
58.
▲
by
efdee
1y ago
Sounds like an AVG problem, not a Windows problem.
59.
▲
by
efdee
2y ago
Diabetics have a sensor on their bodies that speaks Bluetooth. It talks to their phones (running eg. xDrip). The phone then communicates this to the watch. My wife is a diabetic and this kind of stuff, while it seems minimal, makes a big di
60.
▲
by
efdee
2y ago
> They have other things to do with their time than learn about security vulnerabilities and how to avoid them. You're making that statement as if iPhones don't have security issues and people using Android definitely have to l
More ›