eertami

33 ms·

331.
by eertami 6y ago
>Have you been to Switzerland? Yes, I live in Switzerland. Is it more expensive to go to a restaurant than in America? Yes, sure, but at least the people working there can have a good quality of life and don't rely on tips to pay re
332.
by eertami 6y ago
Thinking about it, I honestly think my Majestouch might be the oldest thing I own. 10 years of almost daily usage and I wouldn't be surprised if it did 10 more. I did replace the keycaps with PBTs in 2015, as the stock ABS caps were fa
333.
by eertami 6y ago
>You have/raise a minimum wage, consumer prices inflate and then it costs more to live with that minimum wage. I've never understood why people continue to make this argument when there are easily demonstrable counter-examples
334.
by eertami 6y ago
The entire persona is quite clearly fabricated. I'm gobsmacked people are replying to them in good faith.
335.
by eertami 6y ago
But would you rather work 40 hours per week for €100k or 4 hours a week for €50k?
336.
by eertami 6y ago
I still have the installer so I'm not too worried about that.
337.
by eertami 6y ago
My plan is to keep using Photoshop CS6 for as long as my computer will let me. There aren't any CC features that I feel a compelling need to use.
338.
by eertami 6y ago
>Android -> iOS This is just going out of the frying pan and into the fryer. (I assume you mean stock/Google powered Android here.) Replacing one user-hostile walled garden with another user-hostile walled garden is hardly an imp
339.
by eertami 6y ago
Surely then it is much simpler/cheaper to ban fascists and delete content that incites violence? Unless of course... you aren't really a social platform, and what you really want to be is a fascism platform. Parler pretending to b
340.
by eertami 6y ago
Until the US implements proportional representation, any third party is always going to have an inconsequential amount of votes.
341.
by eertami 6y ago
It unequivocally is in no way relevant. Sure, if these people you mention had invaded the white house with weapons and make-shift bombs then it would be a fair comparison. However that didn't happen, it is a completely false equivalenc
342.
by eertami 6y ago
It's even clearer on WhatsApp, because every message is sent over the internet and never via SMS.
343.
by eertami 6y ago
>27" 2K is gross. Compared to 4K, it looks so pixelated that I feel like I'm back in the 90s. I don't know, that sounds a little embellished at first read. Either you sit way closer than ergonomic norms or you have irregul
344.
by eertami 6y ago
>message of deescalation Pull the other one. That's not what it was.
345.
by eertami 6y ago
> And then whenever they would post rank inaccuracies, there were clearer-minded people to point out why they were wrong, in the same place where the same people could see it. I don't think this works on reddit either, since subredd
346.
by eertami 6y ago
>Doesn't include monitor, keyboard, mouse, speakers, webcam, microphone, battery backup, and fingerprint scanner which would be necessary to make it "comparable" to a base model Macbook Air. Let us not pretend that you don
347.
by eertami 6y ago
Sounds like the problem exists between keyboard and chair. Executing strange binary files from untrusted sources could ruin your day on Mac and Linux as well. It is only less common because market share is so small compared to Windows, and
348.
by eertami 6y ago
I disagree, it doesn't result at all in a "net increase" of lawfulness, it's just an extra person breaking the law and driving badly. UK highway code is pretty clear on when it is acceptable or not to flash your headligh
349.
by eertami 6y ago
In the UK you should only flash your high beams to alert other drivers to your presence. Using them as you describe could lead to a £1000 fine. I understand that people using them to warn drivers is also illegal, but two wrongs won't m
350.
by eertami 6y ago
Check the laws in your local area first. Intentionally dazzling other drivers may be illegal and can carry a much higher fine (sometimes 10x more) than speeding, depending on country.
351.
by eertami 6y ago
So you object to people speeding illegally, yet you have no problem with using your lights to illegally distract other drivers? How curious!
352.
by eertami 6y ago
$549!? That puts it in the same price category as: Sennheiser HD660S, Audeze LCD-1, Beyerdynamic DT1770/1990, Grado RS2e, among many many others. Honestly, I don't understand why you would buy these when there are a lot of establi
353.
by eertami 6y ago
>I'd be desperate too if I were trying to pretend Android is a serious competitor performance-wise when the CPUs are 18-24 months behind and the gap is still widening. I open WhatsApp on an iPhone XR. It launches instantly. I open W
354.
by eertami 6y ago
>Valve has no excuse, they make crazy amounts of money, they can fund the development of a new engine from scratch easily. They just choose not to. It admittedly gets a bit more difficult when these hacks and quirks are part of what crea
355.
by eertami 6y ago
Most people get a measly 2 days of leisure time per week and you want to ban them from being able to use cars/leave the city on their 2 free days? Good luck I guess?
356.
by eertami 6y ago
>Apple gives their OS away, but in theory you can only run it on their hardware. If you don't understand why this isn't free then I have a bridge to sell you.
357.
by eertami 6y ago
>macOS is free Oh wow, that's cool, I didn't know that. Do you have a link to where I can download the free edition of macOS? Google doesn't seem to be helping me.
358.
by eertami 6y ago
If this is truly a problem for you, your statement should be "Remind me to never, ever use Bluetooth". It is nothing to do with Android.
359.
by eertami 6y ago
>Editorializing is twitter reading the tweet, deciding whether it is true or false, and then showing their decision to the end user together with the tweet. Nope, that is simply not what editorializing means, in any sense of the word. Tw
360.
by eertami 6y ago
No it isn't. I'm quite sure you know it isn't. Being _unable_ to censor the president is what would be anti-democratic. Only in authoritarian regimes would a leader be able to force private companies to spread their message.

More ›