No it isn't. I'm quite sure you know it isn't. Being _unable_ to censor the president is what would be anti-democratic. Only in authoritarian regimes would a l

No it isn't. I'm quite sure you know it isn't. Being _unable_ to censor the president is what would be anti-democratic. Only in authoritarian regimes would a leader be able to force private companies to spread their message. In a democratic country, you have the freedom to choose what you want to support and not support.