Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eduction
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
661.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Reasonable people can disagree on whether retroactively enforcing a very broadly written legalistic TOS is sufficiently similar to editing a newspaper to qualify as editorial control (no sarcasm). My point was to the question (paraphrasing)
662.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Ya use what you like, the more of these tools the better, just setting record straight on notmuch as I use the cli every day via scripts
663.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Well put, thanks! Interesting.
664.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Notmuch is fully command line, there are any number of traditional cli commands, it’s a suite ala git but not a tui or anything: https://notmuchmail.org/doc/latest/ See for example notmuch-search and notmuch-tag.
665.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
I appreciate the answer. Interesting. My read on that section was that it was all around specifically the request for immediate preliminary relief (to stay the state law basically?) — this was from section IV right? - and in that section th
666.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
I think it’s likely OP made an honest mistake of some sort (as opposed to an intentional deception) but I do wish he’d correct it. It was a pretty broad and dismissive statement and personally maligning the judges involved in decisions we d
667.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Correction: Jones was concurring and Southwick was the dissent. I can’t find any evidence of how ABA ruled on Jones’ qualifications back in 1985 but it’s clear Oldham who wrote the opinion that appears first was never found “unqualified.” I
668.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
What do you think the most convincing part of that techdirt piece is? To me it mostly reads like an exasperated emotional rant. He calls the ruling “stupid” and “batshit crazy” and likens the judges to “ignorant trolls.” And uses italics ev
669.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
What about the “Net Centers” in Guatemala? Don’t they use platforms like Twitter to actually harass/silence dissidents? Obviously social media isnt everything, but Morales and his backers sure showed how important it is. Or do you dis
670.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Touché! But the bit I quoted is something of a non sequitur as this case, like PruneYard, concerns a state law extending additional speech protections into the private sector, so PruneYard does seem relevant, as PruneYard affirmed a state’s
671.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
> Of course the judges in question were rated unqualified by the ABA (which is a really low bar) so not surprising. Not true. The first of the two judges who concurred on this opinion, Andrew Oldham, was unanimously rated “well qualified
672.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
> The first amendment does not protect you against anything but the government. Full stop. Even setting aside this opinion, this is false, at least according to the Supreme Court. See the PruneYard case that this court repeatedly cites
673.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
> How the 1st Amendment might protect a corporation's religious POV but not its exercise of editorial control is a very good question I don’t think this court buys the idea that the platforms exercise editorial control. For example:
674.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Full opinions here: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-51178-CV1.pd... Each judge wrote their own opinion. You can see the first two judges are in agreement, the last writes, “ I concur with the
675.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Correct. The F-16, dating to the mid 1970s, was the pioneer here and was incredibly maneuverable as a result (certainly for its era but probably for today as well).
676.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Macros are special in the sense that they are expressly intended to modify code. I take your implied point that at runtime there is not really a difference between a function designed to rewrite code data structures and evaluate them vs cal
677.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
If you can compile code at runtime, then how are you not able to use macros at runtime via the same facility? Macros are just functions that operate on the data structures that define function calls prior to those calls being executed, symb
678.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
setup and emacs were quite simple for me - for emacs I just installed clojure-mode and cider via melpa like any other package. I think later I added paredit. All should include snippets for your emacs init file on their github project pages
679.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
It’s interesting to me that this story does not try to argue that vaccines and boosters inhibit infection or transmission. At one point this was a key benefit claimed by health authorities and the news media. I think it would be more credib
680.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
I’ve watched Google through its entire “journey” and I have to say it’s revealing how quickly they jettisoned their rhetoric about having, attracting, and retaining what they claimed were the best engineers in the world at the slightest whi
681.
▲
Google has only compiled 163 results about Covid 19
(google.com)
2 points
by
eduction
4y ago
|
3 comments
682.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Ya those were my thoughts exactly, and I used Perl heavily for several years. The number two feature they listed was released more than 22 years ago. Perl is fine for certain tasks, I have no problem with people who choose to use it, but at
683.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
The Helm email server — funded by future YC CEO Garry Tan’s VC firm, but I bought one before he returned – is a really great compromise between privacy and convenience. The IP block is managed by the Helm co., they tunnel connections and se
684.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Reminds me of this Rich Hickey quote: “So how do we make things easy? … There's a location aspect. Making something at hand, putting it in our toolkit, that's relatively simple. … Then there's the aspect of how do I make it f
685.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
About 10-15 years ago they were behaving the same way. I made a post in their forums complaining that their on disk file storage left your list of domain names in cleartext so someone with access to your files could see where you have accou
686.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
I see this kind of pushback from engineers quite often when advocating for privacy first technologies. I think this comment is a good example of the sort of reflexive dismissal many developers have to changing how they work, from being aske
687.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
This is a really interesting comparison! And good context. Is the hotel operating multiple restaurants from one kitchen really different (as some comments here seem to imply) because each has its own physical space? In a way that’s more “sk
688.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
People don’t need incentives to learn about technologies that solve real problems though. I saw the value in Macs, for example, without ever buying Apple shares, I use AWS without owning Amazon, I learned about Linux without profiting from
689.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
Is it so hard to believe that people with “technical skills and knowledge” can be hypocrites? The fact is, pmarca’s engineering chops are not a conspiracy invented by non engineers. He did in fact create a brilliant piece of software (Mosai
690.
▲
by
eduction
4y ago
> I have been quite surprised to encounter a number of people who resist using the forums or the issue trackers to ask questions, file bug reports, or make feature requests. Usually their reasoning boils down to it being too inconvenient
More ›