3 ms·
Correction: Jones was concurring and Southwick was the dissent. I can’t find any evidence of how ABA ruled on Jones’ qualifications back in 1985 but it’s clear
by eduction 4y ago
Correction: Jones was concurring and Southwick was the dissent. I can’t find any evidence of how ABA ruled on Jones’ qualifications back in 1985 but it’s clear Oldham who wrote the opinion that appears first was never found “unqualified.”
If you Google Jones you will find an ethics complaint, maybe that’s what OP was thinking of. It was over a speech she gave (not recorded) and was dismissed.