Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eduah
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
eduah
7y ago
This is false. No member of the NRA has executed a mass shooting.
2.
▲
by
eduah
7y ago
This is not repurposed Tesla hardware, they are using actual Tesla backup battery product.
3.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
That is the point. He only violated it if you take the obviously wrong interpretation that the 500k was a new material statement. It was not. The agreement only covered new, material information, not repeating a previously given the high-en
4.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Actual government legal agency going after someone on a stupid immaterial technicality about requiring approval for disclosing material information that might affect stock: The tweet didn't have material information. The 500k number wa
5.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Guidance for this year was 350k - 500k. Elon said several times on the call that he thought they could beat the 500k. This is a technicality on not getting approval for a tweet that could unreasonably be interpreted as saying they are def
6.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Not misinformation, guidance was 350 - 500. This is a technicality of not getting approval for a tweet that could be interpreted as saying they are definitely hitting 500k 8 months from now. This is stupid. https://twitter.com&#x
7.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
> Publishing in a magazine that’s not peer reviewed doesn’t matter if they’re reporting on their research This framing should tell you the bad faith in which the statement is being made. The authors didn't call it a research, critic
8.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
The hell are you talking about, none of the cliamed in any way that this was an academic research affiliated with any university, only one of them is affiliated with one. In their quillete article they even talk about how this is not an aca
9.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
I find it interesting you can read this negative article about him and choose to believe the bad things, but dismiss the parts you think some might consider a positive
10.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
> Tripp was represented by Meissner Associates in the whistleblower matter earlier, but is now representing himself, attorney Stuart Meissner told CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/11/tesla-seeks-167-milli
11.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
> Tripp was represented by Meissner Associates in the whistleblower matter earlier, but is now representing himself, attorney Stuart Meissner told CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/11/tesla-seeks-167-milli
12.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
> Tripp was represented by Meissner Associates in the whistleblower matter earlier, but is now representing himself, attorney Stuart Meissner told CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/11/tesla-seeks-167-milli
13.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
> Tripp was represented by Meissner Associates in the whistleblower matter earlier, but is now representing himself, attorney Stuart Meissner told CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/11/tesla-seeks-167-milli
14.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
> Tripp was represented by Meissner Associates in the whistleblower matter earlier, but is now representing himself, attorney Stuart Meissner told CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/11/tesla-seeks-167-milli
15.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
FYI, his whistle blower case has fallen apart and he is now having to represent himself on that since his lawyers have abandoned him on that
16.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
That's literally the accusation, that he doctored information he then gave to jurnalist to harm the company
17.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Saying you do not plan to do something, does not mean that you won't change your mind if circumstances change in the future
18.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
His own lawyers have abandoned him on these claims and he is now having to represent himself in the whistle blower case
19.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
His lawyers have abandoned him and he is now defending himself on the supposed whistleblower case.
20.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Ahead of the job numbers he promised https://www.wgrz.com/mobile/article/news/tesla-shares-new-jo... . I will say that project is going very well.
21.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Again, That Tesla under reported injuries, which a 4 month OSHA investigation proved wasn't true. Is that enough of a lie to mistrust Reveal? You must surely know this.
22.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
That Tesla under reported injuries, which a 4 month OSHA investigation proved wasn't true. Is that enough of a lie to mistrust Reveal?
23.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Are you really willing to believe that if the medical doctor thought and ambulance was required for the supposed injury, they will choose to have someone die on their watch, with full legal liability for the death. What do you think the doc
24.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Or, believe the org just proven liars after publishing similar accusations by disgruntled ex employees by an OSHA investigation.
25.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Just posting this here. Choose who to believe. The medical professional who will lose his lincence and be in legal trouble if he lying, or the "news“ org with a bone to pick with Tesla who have are been proven liars by OSHA, whose in
26.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Yeah, no. https://www.tesla.com/blog/one-year-in-tesla-update You don't pass a 4 month long safety inspection by California OSHA by making injured workers continue working. "News organization" writes art
27.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Which one are landing orbital class rockets again? FYI, Blue Origin has been at it longer that spaceX has existed. But SpaceX, spending at least 5X less money is landing orbital class rockets and whilst Blue Origin is doing suborbital fligh
28.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
Yes, precisely what I am saying. That he has no reason, we can reasonably deduce from his statements, to think due diligence, etc might be the reason why the deal doesn't go through. So again, just for clarity, he didn't say the o
29.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
The only accusation here, then can be that he wrongly assumed the should be able to parse him saying "Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured." to not mean Tesla the company has already finish due diligence an
30.
▲
by
eduah
8y ago
If I offer you money for a thing, you have a board you know agrees with a deal to sell, you do no anticipate any due diligence hiccups, isn't the only uncertainty about the sale the vote of you other co-owners of the thing I am trying
More ›