Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
edfletcher_t137
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
The utter lack of screenshots doesn't help either. I also read those pages and am also still unsure of what this is.
32.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
That's a great question! And fortunately, one where you can use human behavior as a guide: if someone is actively using a checklist it seems reasonable to presume they're at least accessing it once a day. So as a quick first-pass,
33.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
You may want to consider a keep-alive strategy based on usage and not an arbitrary static timeout. What if I need my checklist for 7.5 days? A corollary is that this may reduce your overall data usage as a lot of people may create a list
34.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
> The day I stopped believing in the possibility of "self-documenting code" was the day I started writing more readable code. "More readable" is self-documenting! Doesn't matter how you get there (though it
35.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
Another perspective which makes it clear this is The Way: it brings the promise of fully self-documenting code much closer to fruition, if not all the way!
36.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
The fact that we're even debating it shows that they do. And I didn't ask for "an exact line". I asked for anything. What is your qualification for a "micro" library? I'm betting it's different from 9
37.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
Where do you draw the line: is 10 lines "micro"? 50? 100? It is never quantified within, yet the very click-bait-y title relies on the term. How many bugs can hide in 50 lines or 100? And you really want to copy-paste that code at
38.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
> - Somehow reviewers never seem to like the stack of PRs, my experience is they always react with disdain and/or confusion. Are people sending multiple branches of the stack for review at once? It should only ever be the "bott
39.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
> I find merging to be extremely tough to work with -- I don't think I actually got good at git until I learned to rebase entirely. > Also, cherry-picking (effectively an atomic rebase-type) is underrated. This this this, all of
40.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
Sure you can! In fact you can do magic on stacked branches with `rebase --update-refs` that you can't do with merge: https://andrewlock.net/working-with-stacked-branches-in-git-...
41.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
Came here to say this. I was genuinely interested in reading this page, but the blue-on-gray promptly gave me a legitimate headache. I cannot understand the person who thinks this is OK.
42.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
I can't remember what I did yesterday but I will remember my ICQ number until the day I die. RIP to an absolute legend.
43.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
"This wasn't just nostalgia talking. There seems to be something objectively more magical, more infinite-seeming and treasurable about this smaller, more limited version of Magic." Not that I ever had the chance to play the p
44.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
OP isn't the hero we wanted, they're the hero we need.
45.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
Subtitled "Not an actual product render."
46.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
2y ago
Excellent project, well done!
47.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
> The two executives told staffers that the project will begin winding down and that many employees on the team working on the car — known as the Special Projects Group, or SPG — will be shifted to the artificial intelligence division un
48.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
> The PyPA should shut down or merge some duplicate projects, and work with the community (including maintainers of non-PyPA projects) to build One True Packaging Tool. To make things easier. To avoid writing code that does largely the
49.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
I included it because the author did, and irked me by openly admitting they recognize the argument but went against it anyway. There is good reason that particular XKCD hits so hard. Chris Warrick has done a ton of thinking - and a
50.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
LOL I surely did, it even explicitly says: "I did not feel well throwing yet another Python packaging tool into the ring. Yet it exists now and has user. (sic)" TL;DR: I knew it was a bad idea, but I did it anyway. But I wouldn&#x
51.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
This is an impressive effort, no doubt. And Python packaging is in a woeful state. But I'm sorry, the last thing the ecosystem needs it another alternative! https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2023/01/15&#x
52.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
Yes but they greatly enhance readability and are carriers of information. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Just because you can doesn't mean you should . There are so many cliches that apply here.
53.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
> They can only last if they’re simple to maintain, otherwise keeping them working becomes tedious and the author eventually gives up. This, x1000. I cannot count how many hobby projects I have outright abandoned at the first failure, ne
54.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
> So in my opinion, the primary purpose of automated tests is not to avoid failures, but to speed up development. Such a juicy premise, let's dig in. In my opinion the primary "speed up" to development comes in allowing
55.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
This is a lovely book, thank you for putting it together! Immediate bookmark. They really are fun. In fact making small games was my pandemic challenge: I decided that it was finally time to try these things. I ended up building a tool for
56.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
Frustratingly difficult: I love it! The cleverness here is excellent. Well done!
57.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
A clever idea that I'd love to play around with, but not without a source link so I could feel better about trusting it and host it myself.
58.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
> At the moment, the only supported platform is Linux. Regardless of your feelings on the status quo, there is one thing you must do when building a game engine if you want it to succeed: support Windows .
59.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
The style for this site is fantastic . Is it available as importable source somewhere?
60.
▲
by
edfletcher_t137
3y ago
Haha wow, thank you for this: I had no idea! It's a good word, deserves more exposure than that :)
More ›