Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
edem
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
481.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Or the ball is projected from a 3D surface infinitely far away :D (holographic universe theory)
482.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
We don't yet know. Right now the consensus is that the universe will probably expand forever and will ultimately reach heat death. If the acceleration is accelerating though that means a Big Rip scenario, but it is very unlikely.
483.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Wow, I've never read that but I will do so now!
484.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Note that heat death happens when the universe reaches thermal equilibrium (maximum entropy). It is theorized that sudden drops in entropy are possible which could have caused the big bang.
485.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
This depends on the cosmological constant (dark energy). There are 3 scenarios: The big rip, the big crunch and equilibrium. In the big rip scenario, dark energy will overpower all other forces and at some point space itself will expand so
486.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
"dark age" is just something I came up with. By "dark age" I meant that there are no thermonuclear processes left providing light for us. After trillions of years the last Red Dwarf will run out of fuel and there will be
487.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
We're kinda in the mid-game. We can still see __a lot__ of galaxies and can still reach them. The universe will keep expanding forever and at some point, the cosmic event horizon will shrink to the size of our galaxy. There is still a
488.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Why didn't you port it to Kotlin instead? Much better language than Go in every aspect and also comes with an auto-conversion tool.
489.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
There is also the opposite scenario, the Big Rip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEyXTQ9do-c
490.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Why not have an actual black hole on the ship and use the Hawking radiation to gain energy? More [here]( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzZGPCyrpSU&feature=youtu.be... ).
491.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Related: [Black Hole Bomb]( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulCdoCfw-bY ).
492.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
There was a point when I got fed up and unsubscribed from all notifications from everything. Now I only operate in pull-mode. I check my things 1-2 times a day and I receive zero notifications. My life is much better now!
493.
▲
Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating ClimateTragedy [pdf]
(lifeworth.com)
9 points
by
edem
8y ago
|
2 comments
494.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
After!
495.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
I'm not sure. I think this hierarchical nonsense is a German thing. I've worked for IBM and it was a different experience. Still dysfunctional, but in a different way. I never felt at IBM that I was not heard. I also see how Micro
496.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
I'd really like to be able to just sit and do the work and don't care about these things (I'm not talking about you but the ability in general). I just can't help myself. I'm always trying to fix things but with a c
497.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
I've seen "The Big Short" movie lately and I was flabbergasted about how the finance industry works. I'm beginning to realize that this pattern is universal in all industries. I also see that we as a species are suffer
498.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
About time. I had the "luck" of working for multiple German companies (including Volkswagen) and I'm surprised how these behemoths still function. As a grunt programmer, it was painful to see how the upper management made dec
499.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
I'd suggest the book [Working Effectively with Legacy Code]( https://www.amazon.com/Working-Effectively-Legacy-Michael-Fe... ).
500.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Do any of you know about Process Philosophy: https://www.iep.utm.edu/processp/ ?
501.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Do you have remote positions?
502.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
This is exactly what I've been doing for a while. I check whether my ideas are SOLID and this have been enough so far. When I change something it only affects its immediate surroundings so things are easy to fix. If something breaks it
503.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Definitely not. See my comment on the parent.
504.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
My comment from the original post verbatim: I agree with the part that you should write tests, but I definitely disagree with the part that most of your tests should be integration tests. As you pointed out the testing pyramid suggests that
505.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
There was an article on a blog which I can't find now where the author explained this situation in depth. Do any of you have a link to it? I think it would be useful here.
506.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Use Kotlin instead.
507.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
Plot twist: people never "flocked" to Javascript. People use Node for example because the company they are working for thought that it would be nice, efficient and less costly to have one language for the whole platform. They most
508.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
I don't see how this adds any value to the conversation.
509.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
The language is crap. Just because people are using it does not mean it is good. Take a look at javascript. Same deal. You did not state any "fact"s why Go is good. Maybe it is good compared to Cobol or Fortran, but not compared t
510.
▲
by
edem
8y ago
It it is underway it is not solved. Go is crap.
More ›