echeese

10 ms·

61.
by echeese 7y ago
I attach a debugger to the server
62.
by echeese 7y ago
Okay how about codepage 437 then
63.
by echeese 7y ago
The tools are still being worked on but the Chrome team made a pretty big step by adding DWARF support to the debugger: https://twitter.com/ChromeDevTools/status/119280381802471014... EDIT: Here's an article
64.
by echeese 7y ago
What about something like Cloudflare, would you say they're lying when they return a cached file instead of contacting the origin server?
65.
by echeese 7y ago
If someone's able to get the signing key you've already failed at security.
66.
by echeese 7y ago
They can't alter the content - that's where the 'signed' part comes in. Any forms there would still go to the original source.
67.
by echeese 7y ago
How is it no longer safe?
68.
by echeese 7y ago
Seeing how Rust is consistently at the top of Stack Overflow's most loved languages, I'd wager it's gonna be Rust again.
69.
by echeese 7y ago
If it leads to a semantically different page, use <a>, if it's used only for javascript-interactivity use <button>. Never use <div> for buttons or links.
70.
by echeese 7y ago
You'd need to issue a fake certificate to do a MITM attack, they wouldn't be able to decrypt existing traffic without issuing one, which would be noticed by someone watching. Key pinning would have helped with that but it was most
71.
by echeese 7y ago
Not true, you're able to advertise to specific groups of people by sending hashed email addresses in a "Customer List". I found this out when I discovered Rockstar Social Club targeted me for a GTA Online campaign.
72.
by echeese 7y ago
I think you should be wary of doing this - it may do weird things with a cache
73.
by echeese 7y ago
I have that one, I hate it because the key caps keep splitting
74.
by echeese 7y ago
I have done this and it's awful. I don't recommend it because: A) it's a pain in the butt to setup and manage, and more importantly, B) Your cloud server will be blacklisted simply for being in the IP range of these cloud hos
75.
by echeese 7y ago
I was working on something sorta like this, but I thought it'd be cool to make a proxy that takes all requests and runs them through the wayback machine, so you could browse the old web in an old browser whilst maintaining the original
76.
by echeese 7y ago
Verifying Googlebot: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/80553?hl=en
77.
by echeese 7y ago
There's an easier way - don't implement AMP.
78.
by echeese 7y ago
Probably a mix of complicated standards, NIH, lack of standards compliance testing, and "works on my machine"
79.
by echeese 7y ago
You could use DOSBox for that: https://archive.org/details/msdos_qbasic_megapack
80.
by echeese 7y ago
Or an infinite frictionless plane in a vacuum
81.
by echeese 7y ago
I like Lin Clark's drawings on the Mozilla Hacks blog: https://hacks.mozilla.org/author/lclarkmozilla-com/
82.
by echeese 7y ago
What's wrong with it being based in Australia?
83.
by echeese 7y ago
Yeah, it allows Google to preload pages so they load faster - especially on mobile.
84.
by echeese 7y ago
It'd be cool if it used the system's dark mode setting by for the default.
85.
by echeese 7y ago
Two reasons: 1.) The "actual available capacity" is likely referring to how it needs to store information about the filesystem on the device, so you can't use it to store, say, a 64 GiB file on it. 2.) There's been confu
86.
by echeese 7y ago
I think we got our site back on the archive by adjusting our robots.txt.
87.
by echeese 7y ago
Yep!
88.
by echeese 7y ago
Well, the upside is that this is still empty after I disabled everything last time this was posted.
89.
by echeese 7y ago
When I was looking at this and seeing the z-sorting pop I was instantly reminded of Catz, a similar product. Cool to see that was the inspiration
90.
by echeese 7y ago
To elaborate, I meant a permissive CORS policy, which is what I see most often.

More ›