Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ecesena
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
97 ms
·
961.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I co-built/run Theneeds [1] for about 5y. We shut it down during the acquisition. In our case, we weren't sad or anything because the website was "just a frontend" to the recommendation engine, that was in fact the IP th
962.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question, but you may want to have a look at Envoy: https://www.envoyproxy.io
963.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
You should consult a lawyer, but typically a patent can be enforced if all the claims are met. If your new startup does something similar, but with enough variations that you can prove doesn't meet all the claims (here is where you nee
964.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Thanks, I see now, OP's asking about mines, not necessarily miners (though I guess it's a bit hard to distinguish... if I mine, do I have a mine? how many cores should I have to qualify that as a mine?) Anyway, on the >50% atta
965.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Why am I getting downvoted!? The question is what happens if (all) miners shut down. To me, it does NOT seem to be asking what happens if some miners begin to fade out. I'm sure my answer is technically correct. Transactions only happe
966.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
There can't be transactions, so nobody can move bitcoins around.
967.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I suspect he’s also implicitly assuming “the inverse is easy to compute”, so both the operation and its inverse have small K complexity.
968.
▲
Ask HN: How would you store a split secret?
1 points
by
ecesena
9y ago
|
0 comments
969.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I run on avg 1 mile/day, and I play capoeira on avg 1-2 times/week. I've started both 2 years ago (it was when Mark Zuckerberg was running 1mi/day), and successfully maintained both for the past 2 years. I really like es
970.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Blogging. Assuming you’re using your product yourself, if you blog about why you’re using it and which problems you’re solving, you’ll find in the mass people that share the same issues. Note: I’m assuming b2c/smb (given your profile),
971.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
1.5. Use a separate browser for sensitive sites, e.g. banks. (possibly, avoid storing these passwords if you can) I feel this is pretty simple, way simpler than many other recommendations here, and has its benefits especially for people tha
972.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Yes, there's a ton to be done in this space. To my understanding it's almost exclusively owned by theknot on the planning and zola/similar on registry. Both are pretty poor quality imo, but they work. In addition, also advert
973.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I always had the best results reaching out directly to recruiters in my network via linkedin. Typically your connection will redirect you to the colleague in charge of your role, and you ho from there. Every time I tried the fried/frie
974.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Will this work on ios? I’m using wallet and it would be great to continue using it.
975.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
That's what I ended up for MemPa (described above). The idea is that I can't read binary sha256 output, and everything I know that can translate in hex can also translate in base64 leading to shorter secrets. For the special chars
976.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
To my knowledge today the 2 best things are ripple and raiden on ethereum.
977.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
On kraken.com you can buy ripple/XRP (I'm not affiliated).
978.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I know it's not precisely what you're asking, but in the python world there's this new and pretty interesting library, Automat [1]. I believe it's used in Twisted, or at least that use case strongly influenced the lib de
979.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
If you have to change your master password, you have to change all passwords. With a vault, if you ever “leaked” your vault file, it’s the same. To me, it’s hard to think to a realistic case where your master password is leaked, but you’re
980.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I think you're assuming that the algorithm must be reversible, but I don't see why. For example, hash(site|strong_master_password) isn't reversible under reasonable assumptions. If the algorithm is not reversible, "one p
981.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I don't think this is a good idea. Please don't get me wrong, it would be great to have a service to centralize all your passwords including rotation, but this already exists. It's Google/Facebook if you choose to use
982.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
You may want to have a look at MemPa (also commented above) [1]. Please LMK what do you think, info in my profile. [1] https://hackernoon.com/mempa-a-modern-deterministic-password...
983.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
In my personal case I have no such passwords. This said, you can use the counter. The counter isn't necessary an incremental int, you can also for example use yymm if you want to "auto renew" your password every month. So far
984.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I think I share your same concerns: I don't want to rely on any single application for my entire security (and some passwords are my entire security). I recently blogged about the algo I use [1], it's a simple deterministic base64
985.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I wonder if the parent sites are even aware of this. If you can get (well, you can) the autofilled email+password, might as well automatically log the user in. Edit: it's also interesting to see so many EU sites, where in theory you sh
986.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I think there is an important point which is ignored, in the article and here in the thread: typos. Unfortunately, when designing a login flow (and a signup one), you can’t assume that the user always inputs the right things. Try logging in
987.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I’m slightly biased here, but I think you shouldn’t distinguish non-techies from yourself. Mostly because you’re secure only if they are secure, and in addition you can learn a lot about their issues if you’re using the same products. Can I
988.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
I don't fully understand the question. What would your expectation from PH be? And why is it deluded? This kind of sites are followed by people who want to know the next thing. By definition, these people will try a lot of new apps
989.
▲
by
ecesena
9y ago
Bitcoin also hashes twice, i.e. it computes sha256(sha256(.)). Supposedly, this is to protect against extension attacks [1]. Was wondering, any specific reason to choose RSA vs ECDSA? Signatures would be smaller. [1] https://en.w
990.
▲
Advanced Protection with iPhone and iPad
(hackernoon.com)
2 points
by
ecesena
9y ago
|
0 comments
More ›