eat_lemons

11 ms·

1.
by eat_lemons 8mo ago
I do wonder how far they would get with the phantom limb stuff. We know phantom limb stuff is encoded before birth so would alpha waves adjust something so fundamential?
2.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
Read up clean room design and on the IBM bios lawsuits from the 80's and 90's just seeing proprietary code can be a violation Why is it different if we slap a "ml" lable on it
3.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
Read up on clean room design and the IBM lawsuits from the 80's and 90's Just seeing someone else's code is hazardous from a legal precident point of view
4.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
I spend 95% of my day reading existing code not writing it, I have no idea what these developers writing code all day work on
5.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
Counterpoint look at the bios lawsuits that IBM won against people who had just seen IBM's code Or the windows xp leak and how that is a mess for wine/proton/reactos devs There is no concept of fair use in code copyright Co
6.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
There are many instances of people not even being able to see the code in question, see clean room engineering An example for wine/proton/reactos developers from a moderator on the forum about the leaked windows xp code: "You
7.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
Both on a moral and practical sense copilot is a licensing nightmare
8.
by eat_lemons 4y ago
Seeing the 10 dollar price tag has convinced me that you are right. This is a ploy to make a service that replaces developers not help them. No way Microsoft made this investment for a measly 10 dollar subscription. There are not that many