dytyramb

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dytyramb 4y ago

   The bottom line is: 1) DrRacket consumes 0.7 GB od RAM for very little functionality, in comparison to Visual Studio 2) The performace was even worse but than Racket core team switched to excelent Chez scheme, being unable to produce such a
2. 2.▲
   by dytyramb 4y ago

   Of course it's meaningful. The racket community constantly emphasizes `the quality` of the Racketm but in reality they are not able to produce anything that would consume less than 0.5 Gb! Even Microsoft somehow manages to do that (wit
3. 3.▲
   Ask HN: Why DrRacket is so much memory hungrier than “bloated” Visual Studio?

   2 points by dytyramb 4y ago|8 comments