dxg732f

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dxg732f 10y ago

   I think in my case it did, I did learn from the experienced workers but that was apparently not the norm there. I hope you are right that that is what happens most places.
2. 2.▲
   by dxg732f 10y ago

   Most of the really experienced people at companies I have worked for where surprised when I asked about what they did and why. They somehow assumed someone else was supposed to be training me. They were the only ones who knew answers to par
3. 3.▲
   by dxg732f 10y ago

   There's the boilerplate definition of feminism: the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men And then there are articles like this. Each one invents their own take on the concept
4. 4.▲
   by dxg732f 10y ago

   That sounds really interesting. I have also thought about how "good-enough" AI could get a lot more done than many predict. I also like the idea of a Rube Goldberg equivalent of investment schemes and options to achieve certain ob
5. 5.▲
   by dxg732f 10y ago

   I like the main point he is trying to make (which I see summed up by the cliche "think outside the box") but most of the ideas in this article are such stereotypical notions of turning everything on it's head: Aliens? AI taki
6. 6.▲
   by dxg732f 10y ago

   Thoughts on the difference between "quid pro quo" and actions leading to reactions?