Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dwringer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
271.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
If Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo, might as well let let let let let. In seriousness I like the ability to make such distinctions even if it can be a huge footgun.
272.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
I've always felt to an extent that conscious actions can be at some level impulsive - any attempt to explain how we made the decision to act, no matter how well-founded and seemingly logical, invariably involves some post-hoc rationali
273.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
People routinely cross the threshold from thinking about something and processing it on their own time into a state of nonproductive recurrence of said thoughts in which no real processing is done. Managing this kind of symptom is often the
274.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Toward the end, the article states "unfortunately I won't be playing this instrument very often, and I most definitely won't practice for hours to improve my left-hand technique. This rather undermines the potential for the C
275.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Cool font, the topmost two banner examples are a little big for optimal legibility on my monitor though, and zooming in/out doesn't change the size (it does for the lower ones, though). Because it expands past my normal reading FO
276.
▲
Solving Elgar's Enigma (2010)
(journals.library.columbia.edu)
1 points
by
dwringer
4y ago
|
0 comments
277.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Whoa, thanks to your comment, which helpfully illustrates some of the "poetic" aspects of the digits' decimal arrangement, I became instantly convinced the digits of pi are the theme on which Elgar wrote his "Enigma"
278.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
This evokes thoughts of 3-LISP and what is, to me, one of the most compellingly titled papers in CS: "The Mystery of the Tower Revealed"[0] [0] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/319838.319871
279.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
JWST is undeniably a superior and remarkable instrument, but there has been a bit of a trend I have noticed on social media - and this may just be my perception rather than reality - of comparing it with suboptimal alternatives rather than
280.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
See here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33247735
281.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Really nice work. Some really good sounds in there, I especially like the opening which makes me think of a heavily processed chorused piano, and then some of the sounds after that bordering right on the edge of distortion. Very atmospheric
282.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Rather Borgesian I think.
283.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
On Wikipedia is the claim "The telescope also originally had military intelligence uses, including locating Soviet radar installations by detecting their signals bouncing off the Moon."[0], which gives this[1](by name, but unlinke
284.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Sun Tzu?
285.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
> At what point do they start breaking up into unrelated orbits? I can't speak with any authority, but in general a train of satellites would likely be moving in an orbit with either the apogee/perigee similar to the target orb
286.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
A passenger tampering with the flight controls of a 747 is also insane, but if there are no pilots and the plane is in an uncontrolled dive, then it's still not necessarily a bad idea.
287.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
There are pros and cons to the approach. Information from such actively hostile sites tends to be of a lesser quality and of questionable reliability anyway IMHO.
288.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
I'm not familiar enough with existing implementations of such systems to dispute it, but there's no fundamental reason algorithmic composition systems could not include modulation parameters of all kinds (pitch/breath/ef
289.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
MIDI is extraordinarily expressive and is likely used to sequence a large majority of music produced within the last three decades. A lot of the instruments you hear are synthesizers or samplers running directly from MIDI. There is a lot mo
290.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
It means they are effectively the same as you shift rightwards or leftwards on the neck. So you can play a G major chord, move the same exact shape "down one string" and now it's a C major chord. This is not a feature of stan
291.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Unfortunately I don't have the full working codebase anymore. Although I think I have enough I could recreate it, it was pretty rudimentary and I've always intended to revisit the idea one day and flesh it out as at least a blog p
292.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Amazon specifically does not want third party sellers contacting customers through side channels other than Amazon itself, and thus does not typically give out emails directly. Third-party sellers are typically given an address like <gib
293.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Several years ago I implemented some very basic rules outlining some distance metrics between two chords and ran some multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to generate, say, a 16 bar progression while trying to minimize these distances bet
294.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Interested to know more about your experience with uncompressed audio generated from pseudorandom numbers. Do you know what PRNG you were using? I would think the simplest common ones would indeed be terrible but it could be very interestin
295.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
For this reason I actually thought it was a good comment. I've seen the reference come up almost without fail in discussions like this, but I've never seen it so elaborated.
296.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
I wonder if everyone has a different optimum here based on different eyesight, screen size, and usage patterns. I always have a slightly different zoom on every website I visit. With this one I tend to agree, I can't see enough text at
297.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
I believe the answer is already in the comment to which you've replied: > they chose the numbers big enough to result in [...] overflows
298.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
I think that's been upscaled, as it shows Neptune being over 300px in diameter. Unless I'm misinterpreting something (a distinct possibility), that would require an angular resolution of nearly 10x what the JWST is capable of. I d
299.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
Thanks for the links! I checked out the source image and it still appears to be 80 pixels high in the "full resolution for display" image, same as the article's crop. There is a "close up" view which shows Neptune a
300.
▲
by
dwringer
4y ago
I tried comparing this image with some from the Hubble and this one appears to be slightly sharper (not to mention much more detailed in terms of the atmosphere thanks to the infrared wavelengths). I don't think it gets too much high
More ›