dustyharddrive

6 ms·

1.
by dustyharddrive 3mo ago
6. is a sign of bad UX but not leakage to the recipient.
2.
by dustyharddrive 9mo ago
https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-a-post-american-enshittification...
3.
by dustyharddrive 11mo ago
The founder... runs a crossposting bot here: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... spammed package maintainers: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31588316
4.
by dustyharddrive 11mo ago
Great news for this site's most prolific spammer!
5.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
One might wish to avoid overbought and uniquely unethical companies.
6.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
I mean a custom index, but not one of those fintech apps with small limits on the number of stocks.
7.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
Is there a direct indexing service that doesn't have exorbitant fees?
8.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
That's the latest ESR ( https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/notes/ ), which seems good enough for Tor Browser.
9.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
They pivoted to "AI": https://browsercompany.substack.com/p/letter-to-arc-members-...
10.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
Arc has been abandoned.
11.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
https://www.freetaxusa.com/privacy > The information given may be used to improve and develop and train our artificial intelligence and other machine learning models.
12.
by dustyharddrive 1y ago
nu 0.103.0 released with background job support a couple months ago. Maybe give it another shot?
13.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Bad for Oracle or its victims?
14.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
This looks very GDPR compliant!
15.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Why sign their limitation of liability?
16.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
If this is about OTF, do you also distrust Let's Encrypt, Quad9, Tails, F-Droid, Signal, and Tor?
17.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Keep in mind that Startpage is owned by an American advertising company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System1
18.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
It's FOSS and maintained by Tor Project team members: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/mullvad-brows...
19.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Maybe they've used those names to test their OpenAI-compatible API ( https://api-docs.deepseek.com )?
20.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
And you can run one written in a memory-safe language, like Caddy.
21.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Anyone have an informed preference between MLKEM and SNTRUP?
22.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
> CPU vulnerabilities These are another source of obselence. Intel generally sets an "End of Servicing Updates" date at seven years post-launch.
23.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
> every email through "git send-email" contains my original IP address for everyone to see Is this the fault of git or your SMTP provider? I looked through a mailman archive and couldn't find my client IP address. The firs
24.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
> The current owner, Llama Group, has plans for the app that are not open-source compatible. > Instead, ... "Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version." >
25.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Matrix metadata is stored by all participating homeservers. That's significantly worse.
26.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
Those are instructions to send a copyright infringement notice with tons of PII. We should have higher standards for "opt-out" than that, even for non-consensual data vacuums.
27.
by dustyharddrive 2y ago
They can't be bothered to allow opt-outs ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39771318 ) or even attempt to check if code they're archiving is freely licensed ( https://www.softwareheritage.org/faq&
28.
by dustyharddrive 3y ago
Headers have the IP address of their mail service.
29.
by dustyharddrive 3y ago
At least some of their software has unique user agents ("Software Heritage*"). I wish a popular FOSS host like Codeberg would block them.
30.
by dustyharddrive 3y ago
Using this on memory-unsafe languages is just asking for trouble.

More ›