duhhhhh1212

4 ms·

1.
by duhhhhh1212 13d ago
Because I want to read the author's words, not claude's, chatgpt's or grok's. Note to folks who have this same thought (seems like many given other comments). Why are you on this site if you aren't here for human-cr
2.
by duhhhhh1212 13d ago
Do you constantly want to be reading ai-generated content on this site? If so, why not just stay on chatgpt.com and ask it to generate what hackernews.com would look like today? It's adding to the discussion because I feel like the aut
3.
by duhhhhh1212 13d ago
https://www.pangram.com/history/c3ad864f-2a50-4785-a0ef-71f2... why not use your own words? If you are gonna ai generate this blog, just post the prompts instead.
4.
by duhhhhh1212 20d ago
Good god. You are burden shifting. a) big claim no evidence. b). says a has no evidence; therefore, I will continue to not let fear manipulate me into believing a claim without evidence. I have a bridge to sell to anyone who believes a big
5.
by duhhhhh1212 20d ago
bruh what? Are we reading the same blog? Bryan says the responsibility is the person making the extraordinary claim. If tomorrow Jacob Coxon comes on CNN and says "Jacob Gold is an extinction risk to humanity". What are we suppose
6.
by duhhhhh1212 20d ago
Wow!! Bryan comes out with another banger. Dude, not only did I learn new words from reading this piece, like ilk and bedlam, but also felt this weight of responsibility to inform others around me about the reality of the situation outlined
7.
by duhhhhh1212 28d ago
They have a ton of rfds publicly available that are worth reading. Recently, read this one: https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0161 because I'm researching clickhouse for my work (there is also a podcast ep on
8.
by duhhhhh1212 28d ago
Someone should make a browser extension to label HN posts with Pangram results of the top 100 posts, so I don't waste my time reading crap. Always a pleasure reading Bryan's writing; it's like Bryan is sitting there with you
9.
by duhhhhh1212 2mo ago
Damn, not blaming you for job losses. Indirectly influencing upper management isn’t your fault. That’s on them. I’m saying if you look at what strongdm preached it leads to tokenmaxxing.
10.
by duhhhhh1212 2mo ago
> Have you really seen engineers fired for failing to spend $1,000 on tokens a day because their bosses read my piece about Strong DM? Bruh, come on. Not directly is the best answer I have for that. Unfortunately, they didn't read y
11.
by duhhhhh1212 2mo ago
Yes, Strong DM. How is that different from tokenmaxxing? Because of the article you wrote, a few companies went to them and starting adopting their methods and guess what happened in a few weeks into that process? Upper management started t
12.
by duhhhhh1212 2mo ago
It's hard to read this take seriously, when you promoted a company spending $1k per engineer per day on LLM usage.
13.
by duhhhhh1212 3mo ago
What a weird thing to say. The phrase “outsourcing to India” being used as shorthand for “you don’t need top engineers.” The nationality stereotypes are mean and degrading.
14.
by duhhhhh1212 3mo ago
Thanks!! Those are solid numbers but confusing. He reported input, output, and cached input token reads but not cache writes/cached creation input tokens? Maybe cache writes aren't a thing internally?
15.
by duhhhhh1212 3mo ago
Where is the cost breakdown? I feel like this would be the easiest number to determine and write in this post. It's hard to believe that there have been no problems/downsides since the port.
16.
by duhhhhh1212 5mo ago
Axios = Company Madison Mills = reporter (no control over Axios) AI wave timeline: Investors throw money at AI and companies using AI Company X sees investors throwing $$$ and starts dancing too Axios (monkey see monkey do) Future: Investor
17.
by duhhhhh1212 7mo ago
https://math.mit.edu/~apost/courses/18.204-2016/18.204_Jon_L... doesn't this paper demonstrate the same thing like a decade before?