dudefeliciano

5 ms·

61.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
well she is only 23 so naivete would make sense, although it looks like she held some AI safety roles so...
62.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> Most people are already used to rely on the internet on basically everything FAANG has trained them well. "Normal" people also use chatGPT & co. to ask mundane questions that qwen27b could easily answer (random trivia, wr
63.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
I mean "from a philosophical/psychological/physiological pov i think of them as sharing a lot of the characteristics of hardcore monks/yogis." "warriors do not have the same goals as monks," "he is ad
64.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
I don't think not labeling an AI generated image will result in violence or death threats. Do you also feel that speed limits are a governmental overreach?
65.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
i guess that only works cause it's a text glyph and not a unicode emoji
66.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
I work mostly with React but maintained a cross-framework web component library for a while, most of the issues that came in from our users we could not do anything about, as they had to be fixed by framework maintainers...the project died.
67.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
isn't the issue here that React & Co. don't follow standards to support web components?
68.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
You think that the status quo sucks and that there is no alternative, that's your prerogative. But why do you complain about people who think there is an alternative and try to implement it?
69.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
what's the alternative? Let our benevolent techbro oligarch overlords decide what is best for us?
70.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
there are plenty of PHDs out there who have been bought and are in the pockets of industry...
71.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> people who act like renewables are "freeing" ... and the people who advocate nonstop for government management Where did the person you are replying to even hint at that? I think this may be your own prejudice spilling out h
72.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> it does not take a great leap to infer that Anthropic is now using the same playbook. > but Anthropic created the playbook I was pointing out who the copycat is in this context, did not think i would have to explain this
73.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
I think that has to do with the marketing and all the memes about how much "less" of the film you see if not watching it on 70mm IMAX
74.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
i go to independent local cinemas, people are pretty respectful there too.
75.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
me too, everyone says it sucks and to wait for Golden Gate to release.
76.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Plot twist, the experts are lobbyists and they convince our politicians to start fracking and massively increase the use of "clean coal"
77.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
The point they are making is that climate change will further push these conditions, so are we willing to build more nuclear power plants, knowing that by the time they are ready to go online this problem will be worse? Or better to invest
78.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> Walruses, I have no idea how they manage to feed either. they blow air on the sea floor to dislodge clams, use their whiskers to locate them and and then suck them out of their shell. I did not know walruses survive mostly on clams bef
79.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> there will become a culture of legal impunity coupled with an extreme concentration of wealth and control of intelligence There will be? We're living in that culture.
80.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
but Anthropic created the playbook, or have we forgotten about Mythos and the initial Fable ban?
81.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> First off, let me point out that you are on a tangent here and not on the topic we started with. I don't think I am, my initial comment was pointing out the flaw in your reasoning that a monk and a nuclear sub sailor share philoso
82.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Since you linked to a Goenka tradition follower: in Goenkas evening talks he mentions the anecdote of a student who was suffering physically and mentally and could not find the cause of his suffering in western medicine, when questioned by
83.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Thanks for your response. In your first paragraph you conflate hinduism, buddhism and taoism. I don't know enough about hinduism but I find the taosim/buddhism connection problematic. They are 2 different philosophies with differe
84.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
And a few other things that made me think about your comment: > for mankind to flourish the negatives must be suppressed and the positives enhanced. This, to me, shows a profound misunderstanding of taoist teachings. Nothing should be fo
85.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
I understand where the costs come from, but how trains are more expensive to operate than airplanes is still baffling to me.
86.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Are there monks teaching and practicing adharma? Where does the Buddha condone violence or killing?
87.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Ever heard of the phrase “the exception that proves the rule”?
88.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Philosophically and psychologically I don’t think any monk of any religion would approve working on a weapon capable of razing cities to the ground.
89.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
> The government isn't one monolithic entity Ok but when you said "There was a past American government that was strong enough to stamp out inequality" you did not make that distinction. The US government in 50s and 60s wa
90.
by dudefeliciano 3mo ago
Paleontology != History

More ›