Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dudefeliciano
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
Maybe because that is not the argument I am trying to make?
92.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
I linked to a study exploring the numbers in the US states where abortion was banned, not referring to Italy here. My response was to the "rape victim red herring" which i find incredibly distasteful.
93.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
Even so, you are deliberately dismissing rape victims that got pregnant[1], what is their recourse? Or do you just care about the rights of a fetus while it's in utero and then they're on their own as soon as they pop out? [1] htt
94.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
the question was why do far right populists care so much about genitals and reproduction, nothing to do with whatever you are saying here
95.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> There was a past American government that was strong enough to stamp out inequality and fight for civil rights. this is a hilariously naive rewriting of history, the government was very reluctant to make those changes. It's thanks
96.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
I think if high speed rail was a viable option in the US and Europe those numbers would look a lot different.
97.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
What about short distances? Why is it cheaper to fly Berlin-Stuttgart than to take a train? it makes absoutely no sense.
98.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
and according to the article the last record was 200k planes per day on june 29 2025, while july 23rd had more than 280k - so while efficiency may be going up (how many of those 280k planes are in the modern 100-120mpg range?) total flights
99.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
Technically history only refers to the parts of the past for which we have written records.
100.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
Nope[1]. I am getting tired of people looking up to China just because the governments of Europe and US are completely fucked. China is no better. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_misinformation_by_Chi...
101.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
They did downplay the effects of covid and spread misinformation about it as well as silence the researches and journalists who were first trying to ring the alarm bells
102.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> it remains internal affairs and not an imperialistic threat That's pre 1945 style thinking, which is coming back with a vengeance.
103.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
it's stupid because there are ways of turning a profit without killing thousands of people while turning your own country into a pariah ridiculed by the whole world. It's stupid because it's shortsighted.
104.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
if anything they are looking at North Korea and confirming their belief that nuclear weapons are indispensable for their sovereignty.
105.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> First the meaning of "war" needs to be defined. FWIW, in the US, only Congress can declare war. The Korean War was not approved by congress. And I don't see the point of bringing semantics into it. Are you saying that th
106.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
the US being the only existent superpower
107.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> which raises the question who asks for this? Probably the 5000 ultra-rich who own 27% of Germanys wealth. CDU/CSU and even AfD is great news for them. https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/05/27
108.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> How does choosing your book’s font and margins apply to freedom of speech? The fonts and margins dont communicate anything by themselves. There is a book that communicates ideas/opinions and that is what's protected by the fi
109.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
You still are missing the point which is: how does infinite scroll relate to freedom of speech? It just doesn't.
110.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
ony if you explain how infinite scroll is necessary for freedom of speech and of the press
111.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
What exactly is unconstitutional about regulating infinite scroll? Did your founding fathers fight for indipendence from GDPR?
112.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> This is EU Cookies Banner level of state interference making UX worse for everyone A couple of comments up in this thread.
113.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
Right, it has a set of treaties, not a unified constitution. And there have been a number of cases in which member state laws clashed with EU laws: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primacy_of_European_Union_law
114.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
I'm trying to think of a small operator that absolutely needs inifinite scroll on their site for their product to "work" and nothing comes to mind.
115.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
You seem incredibly sure about the health safety of a technology we've had for ~20 years and of which the daily usage has been steadily rising in that time. US kids average 5 hours/day on social media. By the way heroin use was wi
116.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
the EU doesn't have a constitution
117.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
then we pass a law to prevent randomization
118.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
There is no show more button and scroling to the graph takes less than half a second.
119.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> How they will affect weather patterns or whatever? > This is why graphs like this matter. Not because they prove that catastrophe is inevitable, and not because they predict the precise sequence of events over coming years. Science
120.
▲
by
dudefeliciano
3mo ago
> One minute I'm trying to use an entire week's worth of quota in less than 24 hours, then moments later I read the deadline has been punted and I have only 25% remaining to last me an entire week. tbf anthropic reset the usage
More ›