dubya23

6 ms·

1.
by dubya23 8y ago
Honestly I think much of the problem lies here, the definitions people are using for Gender and Sex have shifted and for many, on the right certainly, they mean the same thing while they are distinct to the left. However that doesn't e
2.
by dubya23 8y ago
But men ARE better at games and they ARE stronger physically and they ARE faster and they DO have better reaction times. We can debate the reasons all day and I'm happy to do so but the problem is that people are denying the basic meas
3.
by dubya23 8y ago
You can look up countless instances of Social Science professors and students saying unironically that for instance superior Male performance in sports is entirely due to social upbringing. These people are overwhelmingly on the left politi
4.
by dubya23 8y ago
I think you are seriously overestimating our current understanding of the universe/physics. For instance we don't even know if our universe is finite or not, if it's infinite then your point is moot and you literally would ha
5.
by dubya23 8y ago
It's critically important to admit that there ARE differences in the first place. Something that inexplicably has become taboo to many on the left.
6.
by dubya23 8y ago
Yeah the sexes are exactly identical. Males lack ovaries because of environmental effects... /s
7.
by dubya23 8y ago
>Apparently too many people dismiss the second possibility and forget reporting about it when discussing the topic. I doubt most people even HN types have read the actual argument. > I can think of several limits of physics and comple
8.
by dubya23 8y ago
I don't think you are representing the argument accurately. The logic is as follows: 1. Assuming any rate of improvement of simulations there will reach a point where a simulation is indistinguishable from reality 2. Advanced species