dsswh

4 ms·

1.
by dsswh 7y ago
And this can be fixed, but by Congress. They need to make it a law that ISPs replace most of the NATs with a better solution.
2.
by dsswh 7y ago
That's a good observation that explains the state of things with ipfs. What they need is a few very senior engineers from say spanner that know how to do this stuff. It will be ludicrously expensive to hire them from google (a million&
3.
by dsswh 7y ago
It's a valid comparison. Long ago it was ok to kill your enemy. Not long ago it was ok to have slaves. Today either is a sure way to end up in prison. Standards are rising. IT is a very new thing and the society and the laws are behind
4.
by dsswh 7y ago
Not long ago, the economy was largely fueled by slavery. Yet we got rid of that.
5.
by dsswh 7y ago
The causation here is the opposite: rich guys are more likely to get married because they are attractive partners. It's like discovering the correlation between the cleanness of a car and its price and hoping to increase its value by k
6.
by dsswh 7y ago
A very important note: he joined the big tech at the beginning of the stocks growth. You can't do this today.
7.
by dsswh 7y ago
It's a valid point, but to be completely honest, the same point applies to all the rich countries. The only reason we can have the life style we have, i.e. drive a car that costs only 20k, wear clothes that cost 20 usd, have a smartpho
8.
by dsswh 7y ago
No, it isn't. Think of G as an oil company that owns and operates a pipe from the oil source (user data) to countries that need gas and other oil products (companies that pay for targeted ads). G employees have access to a lot of knowl
9.
by dsswh 7y ago
Is it the same as the radon map?
10.
by dsswh 7y ago
We live in the world of NATs that effectively prevents any p2p networks.