dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv

6 ms·

1.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 6mo ago
"Part of the initial excitement in programming is easy to explain: just the fact that when you tell the computer to do something, it will do it. Unerringly. Forever. Without a complaint. And that’s interesting in itself. But blind obed
2.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 7mo ago
> in coding, L.L.M.s take away the drudgery and leave the human, soulful parts to you. I've always hated solving puzzles with my deterministic toolbox, learning along the way and producing something of value at the end. Glad that&#x
3.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 8mo ago
Perhaps? The thing is, I don't come to HN comments to read what an LLM has to say. If that's what I wanted then I'd paste the contents of the article into one of them and ask. What's the point of coming here for opinions
4.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 8mo ago
He was unfairly labelled as a lunatic early on. I'd implore anyone reading this thread to see what he had to say for yourself and form your own opinion: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kgCUn4fQTsc
5.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 9mo ago
How do you figure? The portfolio looks to have performed roughly the same as the S&P.
6.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 2y ago
> My main gripe with immutability is that making updated data requires building a full copy of the data again with the changes. Conceptually yes, but the implementation doesn't always necessarily need to work that way under the hood
7.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 2y ago
Composable single-purpose modules that communicate over a standard interface can be more easily achieved without involving a network and the complexity that comes with it.
8.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
> at the same rate
9.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
The first episode of the second season (at least the beginning), seems entirely possible with current technology
10.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
However it can't be produced at the same scale and flood the Internet with misinformation or disturbing imagery at the same rate
11.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
https://archive.is/AUOPt
12.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
What domain do you work in that you never reference stack overflow?
13.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
No it isn't. You can try compiling from source and running it yourself: https://git.j3s.sh/j3s.sh/tree/c4517e8484a68c734d2f17c17c546...
14.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
Are you suggesting the layoffs and new "Overflow AI" product referenced in the article are happenstance?
15.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
What about intelligent animals with no language?
16.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
Perhaps "API design" would be more apt than syntax here
17.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
https://github.com/vitejs/awesome-vite#react
18.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
Well that certainly wasn't what I was expecting: https://chat.openai.com/share/599435fe-ac30-40db-b361-350ab7...
19.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
I find it helps to think about it like this: Whether you specify them or not, the data moving around your application _has_ types. Strings, ints, booleans - they're all there. You're just keeping that information in your head whil
20.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
At some point you just need to throw in the towel when it comes to brand recognition. WeChat is as ubiquitous as Google is in the west for one sixth of the world's population. I'm sure the owner of a hypothetical pre-1998 product
21.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
https://archive.is/QpZix
22.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
https://asahilinux.org/about/
23.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 3y ago
If I'm reading something about React written by Dan Abramov or something about Rust by David Tolnay, I can trust that I'm getting solid information from a trusted source. With AI sometimes the information can be as high quality as
24.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
Using the web while being unfamiliar with Javascript is not analogous to driving without a license. It's closer to driving without being a mechanic.
25.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
The list monster from _Learn you a Haskell_: http://s3.amazonaws.com/lyah/listmonster.png
26.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
Interesting stuff!
27.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
Errors in rust are not exceptions, they're data contained within an `Either` monad (Result) Additionally, on top of the linked RFC being nearly 9 years old it doesn't at all indicate "we want to have exceptions". The ?
28.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
they've probably already done that to us here on earth
29.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
And the modern reimplementation: https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/blob/c7920f2/src/ls.c...
30.
by dsQTbR7Y5mRHnZv 4y ago
Right click the message and choose "remind me later"

More ›