Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
drusenko
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
53 ms
·
481.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Yank the fiber? That'll do it ;)
482.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
This is complete conjecture, but one of the key reasons may be to cash-out the founders/employees. Companies don't usually cash out their own founders, but investors sure as hell have the right to buy the founder's shares if they want. If t
483.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
investors in later rounds are not looking for 10-30x, they are oftentimes happy with a 2-3x return
484.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
you can't reference a good link without sharing it, that's just not fair :)
485.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
I lived on $50 for 2 weeks of food one summer stretch when money was really tight. Meals weren't incredibly healthy, though :)
486.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
1- Periods (.) don't do anything after a domain (ie www.weebly.com.), but they are useful for preventing the browsers from redirecting to http://www.to.com/ 2- The real domain we're looking at: "to" -- no "suffix" attached (TLD: top-level
487.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
From a startup company's perspective (hiring a web developer): - Any effort you make to show interest in the company goes a long way. Use the software, come prepared to talk about what you did/didn't like, and have questions for me. Are you
488.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Fraud is much less likely here than on PayPal, for example, for multiple reasons: a- Card present. Chances of fraud when the card is swiped are much lower than when it isn't (for obvious reasons). b- Signature. This lets you have a basic fo
489.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Wow, there's a lot of confidential info in here. After just glancing over one 5 minute interval: Joe_Brady@Mastercard.com||From:Joe BradyF.Y.I. - Ops is calling a PRT on a SAM (Settlement Account Maintenance) failure - This is NOT a network
490.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
You (supposedly) only move around when you're in certain sleep stages, and not others. When you're moving around, you're still asleep, but you're much more lightly asleep than when you're not moving around, so it's a much more optimal time
491.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Congrats guys! Glad to see that I'll still be able to use the service well into the future :)
492.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
If you think that's bad karma, you clearly haven't dealt with lawyers much. This is about par for the course.
493.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
My favorite are customers that email in a problem, then email in again, then email in again... Then email in that "THEY'VE EMAILED THREE TIMES AND HAVEN'T GOTTEN A RESPONSE!". That, obviously, is quite worrying. So you investigate as to why
494.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genericized_trademark "Where a trademark is used generically, a trademark owner may need to take special proactive measures to retain exclusive rights to the trademark. Xerox corporation was able to generally
495.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Here are a few issues that come to mind: - Nobody wants to be a sysadmin. Being a sysadmin sucks, and taking care of servers is hard. Sure, your content may disappear if the startup goes offline, but it will disappear if you have a hard
496.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
As long as the increase in sign-up rate is larger than the percentage of users who mistype their password, then it's a net win for the website.
497.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Leah's asking the right questions, but I don't think the direction she took is the right one. Users rely on the UI to be familiar, and I've always found Amazon's UI strange in that I have to pause, analyze, and think when logging in/signing
498.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
You have to both mistype your password AND mistype your email for it to be a problem. The percent of users who do that is minimal, and if it happens, it's not the end of the world: create a new account.
499.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
I wouldn't be so afraid of Google being able to unilaterally effect change without consensus. Even getting adoption for their Chrome browser seems to be an extreme uphill battle.
500.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
I'm missing how javascript has the abilities to touch the transport layer in such a fundamental way -- could you explain?
501.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Even so, the current certificate issuing process is lengthy and expensive. Requiring SSL would be a major hit to the mom-and-pop type websites that just want a simple webpage on their own domain for their business. They'd now have to pony u
502.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
There are other forms of risk mitigation that apply strictly to the rich, such as umbrella policies, media insurance policies, etc etc etc. I'm not familiar with very many of them, but they can often be costly. These are needs that the poor
503.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
As you become rich you have more to lose. My experience is that you tend to spend more money on risk mitigation (even though the percentage of income spent may be lower).
504.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Not sure if this is what you meant or not, but while some of the discount comes from the TVM side of things, I'd venture to guess a much larger source of the discount comes from the fact that they have locked you in to a 6 month pass. If yo
505.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
In this hypothetical scenario, the person affected could take a few minutes to verify the information, and then report back to the host that the contact information is invalid.
506.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
Then the original DMCA notice (with fake contact information) is invalid and doesn't need to be followed.
507.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
I'm supporting a system that protects copyrights and that seems to work well, for the most part. It's not perfect, but better than not having it, in my opinion. Sounds like your issue is not with the DMCA, but with copyrights in general, wh
508.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
If the original notice doesn't have real contact information, it is invalid. Once pointed out that the notice is invalid, there is no reason and no liability in not following an invalid notice.
509.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
This email happens to include your full name, address, and other contact information. And it also certifies under penalty of perjury that you are telling the truth. If you don't believe that you can go to jail for 2-4 years in CA for comm
510.
▲
by
drusenko
17y ago
And how many times has the system worked as intended? Any system is going to have some false positive rate. If the logo/image you mentioned was owned by someone else, then it should be removed. It's not bullying, it's their rights, whethe
More ›