drumhead

23 ms·

271.
by drumhead 3y ago
Thats actually the best structure for reddit because of its coopertive nature, and the difficulty of making money from it without compromising its essential nature.
272.
by drumhead 3y ago
All they have to do is keep the ship afloat until it goes public, once thats done they cash out with their millions/billions and then to hell with the site. They'll resign, get fired or whatever but they wont care because they&#x2
273.
by drumhead 3y ago
Too expensive now. I bought a 3060 a year ago and I'm not really seeing much of an improvement on the 1060 I was using. I'll probably keep this card for the next few years, I'm not chasing after an extra few FPS a year.
274.
by drumhead 3y ago
And then lose the moderators that make each sub Reddit work, they could do that, but then it would just turn into Voat eventually.
275.
by drumhead 3y ago
There is no other site more dependant on its users for its success than Reddit. There is no other site with more militant users that Reddit. If they want to they can and will cause havoc. Do you want to invest in something with such a volat
276.
by drumhead 3y ago
Possibly another group in the future, people trying to evade government control from a CBDC.
277.
by drumhead 3y ago
I visited San Fransisco in the late 90s, it was a fantastic place, one of the best cities I went to in th US. What happened? What caused it to get so bad?
278.
by drumhead 3y ago
It's never been a legitimate asset class, it's always been a speculative token, but it hasn't stopped billions being pumped into it by gullible "investors". The only thing that's going to stop the flow of funds
279.
by drumhead 3y ago
A bit of an exaggeration. There's more noise for sure, but you can get a lot more done on the internet now than you ever could before, with more new and useful things emerging all the time. And even if there are issues it's just a
280.
by drumhead 3y ago
If old Reddit goes so do a lot of users.
281.
by drumhead 3y ago
My feeling is that they're prepping us for full disclosure. The evidence and witnesses that were seeing more recently are less fringe and more mainstream. They also don't seem to be trying as hard to debunk claims as they used to.
282.
by drumhead 3y ago
It won't kill it quite yet, but it will reduce demand. I expect the major players in the industry, who are quite litigious, will try to show that their IP was used to train the models so they'll try to get their cut stifle or kill
283.
by drumhead 3y ago
Original Digg was what reddit is now. And Reddit was what Hacker news is now. But luckily I cant see a mass migration here from reddit. I cant even see a reddit replacement. Discord is the platform of choice for discussion these days. Most
284.
by drumhead 3y ago
Its any view that they dont find acceptable however mild they may be. If you dont fit into their political world view you're likely to be banned. Discussion unless you subscribe the dominant viewpoints is almost impossible on reddit. S
285.
by drumhead 3y ago
The headset looks like an amazing product on paper, buts it's pricing is way out of the normal apple range. Whe the iPod, iPhone, iPad, watch came out, they were expensive but affordable. Enough to build up market share and make app st
286.
by drumhead 3y ago
Vision Pro implies a non-pro version could be possible. Cheaper and less funcionality. Either way its an interesting new product and knowing apple they wont ditch it after a couple of years. At this price its just going to be the pro users
287.
by drumhead 3y ago
When the Bluesky and the Facebook competitors launch I can see a lot of big firms moving across to those and leaving Twitter behind. Twitter is going to become the Fox news of social media I think. Lots of hardcore maga, funded by ads from
288.
by drumhead 3y ago
Time for Congress to step in and clarify the issue, which is unlikely considering how divided they are over everything. The only outcome is not to buy from a direct listing.
289.
by drumhead 3y ago
That's pretty standard for a lot of companies. IT log the calls with the supplier.
290.
by drumhead 3y ago
Were they barking up the wrong tree with Watson? They just seemed to give up while Google and Open AI just carried on going. Maybe it was their shortsighted decision to curtail basic research because it wasn't generating a return?
291.
by drumhead 3y ago
Good old IBM, still clueless and heading rapidly towards the gutter of oblivion.
292.
by drumhead 3y ago
Realistically intelligence agencies have access to whatever information they want. If they can crack encryption they're not going to tell us and they will probably act like they can't. You're compromised and you have no secre
293.
by drumhead 3y ago
You sound like an AI generated post.
294.
by drumhead 3y ago
What were they thinking. Nintendo allowing an emulator on steam??
295.
by drumhead 3y ago
Too much capacity and not enough profit. Anyone who puts money into AI startups is going to find it very hard to compete with Open AI and Google. But reality has never stopped a gold rush before and it wont this time round.
296.
by drumhead 3y ago
It's heavily export oriented. When the world economy is growing, Germany is growing rapidly on all cylinders, as soon as it slows down, it takes a big hit.
297.
by drumhead 3y ago
If it's not a fail with Oracle, it's SAP or dynamics or some other "ERP". Do these implementations ever work, and why do these big organisations keep going for them?surely they've seen the string of failures precedi
298.
by drumhead 3y ago
We all go for looks fundamentally. I wouldn't believe any guy that says he wouldn't go for a good looking girl because she only had a high school education. It reminds me of the 2/10 would not bang meme.
299.
by drumhead 3y ago
Would you date someone really hot if she worked in a supermarket, and wasn't all that clever?
300.
by drumhead 3y ago
Lol, all I want is to play CoD and eat my chicken tenders!

More ›