Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
drooby
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
77 ms
·
421.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Well… she had “personal and financial information” on her work device.. reminder that those devices are not the place for such things…
422.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
I’ve been getting this vibe too lately. But I can’t tell if my interests are changing or I’m seeing less interesting stuff.
423.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
I’ll wait for the lawyers to look at the facts before I get outraged.
424.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
I have never tried memory palaces, but I have always wondered if the application of automated memory palaces in VR would work and make the process more efficient.
425.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Not a tweet.. but a Reddit comment.. Was looking for ways to make beer money in college. Read a comment explaining how mobile apps could generate some passive side income. ~8 years later. Majored in CS. Work full time as a Sr iOS engineer.
426.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Huh? The author specifically says organic chemistry is actually complex.
427.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Who defines what speech is harmful or wrong? Democracy is a system in which your party loses elections. And when they lose, do you want them dictating what you can and can’t say? No one has a monopoly on the truth. In fact, our greatest s
428.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
True that it’s not a silver bullet.. I don’t really see it as a fad though. It’s been around for thousands of years. It’s probably not going anywhere.
429.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
I can assure you it’s very very…very.. easy to get enough protein. I have been gaining muscle while just barely caring about what plants I eat. Cheap too. I spent about the national average on food costs for the month. The modern American d
430.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
hmm, this sounds like this could create a lot of jobs though.
431.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
It’s also subsidized
432.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
How much more efficient is it though than the current system with livestock? This process is still growing plants to feed animals to feed humans.
433.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
There is plenty of nonsense on HN. I'd like to evaluate it for myself.
434.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
I saw your link...I would like an explanation for why it was flagged and removed.
435.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
150k vaccine deaths? Source please.
436.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
….? Or maybe there is a interesting and expected answer that provides a learning experience? It doesn’t hurt to ask.
437.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
A proposal to meet for coffee and get to know each other seems to be the opposite of objectification, no?
438.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Level 3+ requires AGI for unmapped non-highway roads. Change my mind.
439.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Your edits have clarified your intent. I thought you were reaching for ad hominem or something by making unsubstantiated claims about my beliefs. “You like Biden”, vs, “You, like Biden”. Regardless though, you’re still making unsubstantiat
440.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
It’s honestly really strange how triggered you are.
441.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Well I disagree. I don’t think there is any such thing as a neutral term in politics. No one has an objective understanding of some combination of words. Just because the term does not illicit emotions in you , does not mean it doesn’t in
442.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Dude… do you know where we are? We are in a comment thread discussing the usage of words in media bias… is this not the time and place? This isn’t a thread about the cartels. Talk about false debate.
443.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
I’m sorry I triggered you. People actually do care about the meaning behind words. That’s why we are talking about it. Words shape understanding, understanding shapes actions, and actions have consequences. Perhaps if we used more compassio
444.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
My understanding.. it is more grammatically correct to say that: A person can be undocumented. However, a person cannot be illegal - they can only commit illegal acts. I.e illegal immigration. Language is flexible though and I understand wh
445.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Solid answer.. None of this needs to be binary this or that though. We can limit or eliminate our intake of meat products through personal choice AND engineer solutions to minimize environmental harm. We can do both and it does not have to
446.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Sounds like you’d be great at Russian Roulette
447.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Huh? Natural justice? No such thing. Yes, you should explain why something is bad, or else we are just doing things based off of how we feel… does that sound better to you? The correct answer should be that the most well reasoned argument s
448.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Reminds me of: “How would a human do it”
449.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
Perhaps Socrates was not in fact wise….But perhaps he would have told you that.
450.
▲
by
drooby
5y ago
It only effects something like 6% of blocks that SpaceX would get the funds for… so basically instead of SpaceX getting $880m they’ll get $825m.
More ›