drinkzima

13 ms·

91.
In China's Cyberspace, Dissent Speaks Code(online.wsj.com)
2 points by drinkzima 14y ago|0 comments
92.
by drinkzima 14y ago
The title obviously isn't your fault, but this is nothing but click bait. Not really related to Google other than existing in their store.
93.
by drinkzima 14y ago
You can pretty much stop reading any article once you hit 'stock dropped because', save maybe earnings announcements. Cause and effect of a 2% move in a stock as volatile as FB is just silly.
94.
by drinkzima 14y ago
The math looks off on the 50% vol 30 day option. No way a $50-strike option on a stock at $25 would be pricing at $20. Unless you mean 50% non-annualized vol, which would not be very conventional.
95.
by drinkzima 14y ago
Wildcard operator pretty much solves this: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=I+cant+stand+all+*+your+li... https://www.google.com/search?sugexp=chrome,mod=11&sourc...
96.
by drinkzima 14y ago
From quarterly report: As of June 30, 2012, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $1.6 billion This is out of their current market cap of ~2.5B. Facebook down 7% after hours too. Honestly looks like an over-reaction that s
97.
ZNGA down 35% on surprise loss.(blogs.wsj.com)
62 points by drinkzima 14y ago|37 comments
98.
Netflix Plunges On Guarded Outlook For New 2012 Signups(bloomberg.com)
1 points by drinkzima 14y ago|0 comments
99.
by drinkzima 14y ago
Between the 0% real rate of return on investments, 0% cost of selling your home, no HOAs, this seems to low-ball cost of ownership by at least 10%. Couldn't even come within 10 years of the NYTimes rent vs buy with my assumptions. Not to
100.
The Secret Online Weapons Store That’ll Sell Anyone Anything (gizmodo.com)
5 points by drinkzima 14y ago|0 comments
101.
MasterCard and Visa Settle Antitrust Suit(nytimes.com)
1 points by drinkzima 14y ago|0 comments
102.
Learning from Fish Could Prevent Crowd Panic(spiegel.de)
2 points by drinkzima 14y ago|0 comments
103.
by drinkzima 14y ago
Im guessing author used data like this ( http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/02/01/rich-o-meter-20/ ) which is household, not individual
104.
by drinkzima 14y ago
Only 5M US millionaires. So math problems somewhere: http://www.cnbc.com/id/47631154
105.
When Yelp advertisers yelp at rates(cbsnews.com)
1 points by drinkzima 14y ago|0 comments
106.
Rebuilding the Credit Crisis with Online Ads (and it’s gross)(blog.tartanlabs.com)
5 points by drinkzima 14y ago|2 comments
107.
by drinkzima 15y ago
He could just divide the CPC by the conversion rate and figure this out in about one sentence: $1.53/0.015 = $101.33
108.
by drinkzima 15y ago
Isn't the whole point that if these Hacker News G+ results are good they should be shown to everyone and if they aren't then they should not. This isn't a 'social' problem it's a ranking problem, right?
109.
by drinkzima 15y ago
Google doesn't editorialize. What do you mean allowed?
110.
Google Ads of the Future(blog.rushrez.com)
13 points by drinkzima 15y ago|2 comments
111.
by drinkzima 15y ago
We have not seen any good numbers, so we stuck with the assumption nytimes uses. 10% does seem generous.
112.
by drinkzima 15y ago
Thanks for the reply. I agree that there are indeed cases where daily deals do make sense. We actually highlight zero fixed cost businesses as being an excellent candidate for daily deals, which is almost exactly the walking tour you high
113.
by drinkzima 15y ago
We definitely agree that the market for daily deals is over-saturated, and there will be tons of failures/exits (see Facebook, Yelp). That said, the doesn't really change the calculations for small businesses. They are either being helped