drb91

40 ms·

451.
by drb91 8y ago
It strikes me as really weird that’s all you can see, especially as a grown adult, but to each their own.
452.
by drb91 8y ago
So why are you rambling on about unrelated pet topics in HN threads?
453.
by drb91 8y ago
Because bloomberg failed at basic jounalism, we will likely never know.
454.
by drb91 8y ago
> Moreover, what would the Pentagon gain by running a UFO psy-op? Space Force
455.
by drb91 8y ago
Any evidence of this theory?
456.
by drb91 8y ago
> I actually don't care what the truth is Why are you in this thread at all then?
457.
by drb91 8y ago
How would you verify this theory?
458.
by drb91 8y ago
Are you trying to communicate or be a dick? The only universal value I am aware of in san francisco is capitalism.
459.
by drb91 8y ago
If there is value in this semantic quibbling you have failed to illustrate it.
460.
by drb91 8y ago
Did you miss the rule about loving your juniors?
461.
by drb91 8y ago
The CoC does not require religious belief in the least. They are secular rules. By this same logic, we should reject all scientific research that predates nation state funding.
462.
by drb91 8y ago
What on earth are you talking about? Can you rephrase in a way that a reasonable person can follow?
463.
by drb91 8y ago
While you are correct that “respect people” is a better general purpose rule, you are throwing out the baby with the bath water: experience is valuable.
464.
by drb91 8y ago
Only if you are looking for it. I imagine most adults can translate through time and culture without much issue. Literalists tend to be evangelical christians, who probably wouldn’t mind.
465.
by drb91 8y ago
This does not seem like satire in the least. The rules seem more like common sense than anything humorous.
466.
by drb91 8y ago
...capitalism?
467.
by drb91 8y ago
How do you figure?
468.
by drb91 8y ago
Any actual critique or are you just gonna scream at the moon?
469.
by drb91 8y ago
What values are you referring to?
470.
by drb91 8y ago
Code of conduct still requires enforcement.
471.
by drb91 8y ago
As an atheist, how could this possibly make someone mad?
472.
by drb91 8y ago
@dang Why was this flagged?
473.
by drb91 8y ago
This is true. But why would they have an overstock? Either it is unpopular and not worth counterfeiting or it’s counterfeited immediately because it’s popular to undercut. The scenarios seem difficult to distinguish.
474.
by drb91 8y ago
“We”?
475.
by drb91 8y ago
Or even just prefix the tweet with the update ordinal.
476.
by drb91 8y ago
It all depends on how you use reviews, I guess. I look for obvious problems and cost that in. Anecdotally it’s fairly difficult to hide bad reviews. It’s your expectations that make you unhappy; I don’t expect much buying a product sight un
477.
by drb91 8y ago
It’s a myth that people “needed” saudi oil. Men are greedy and will use any justification to satiate their greed. It is up to you to accept the justification or not.
478.
by drb91 8y ago
Just because fraud is illegal doesn’t mean you can’t see it coming.
479.
by drb91 8y ago
Why aree you ordering brands off amazon rather than from the brand? You get what you pay for. Good luck on the fraud charge.
480.
by drb91 8y ago
Are you kidding? People I know have TERRIBLE judgement when it comes to products. Who builds trust based on that characteristic?

More ›