dragongod2718

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dragongod2718 6y ago

   u/Gwern's [explanation on why Google didn't produce GPT-3 earlier]( https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/N6vZEnCn6A95Xn39p/are-we-in-... ): As far as I can tell, this is what is going on: they do not have
2. 2.▲
   by dragongod2718 6y ago

   I don't think this is an overestimation of intelligence. That ability is itself intelligence.
3. 3.▲
   by dragongod2718 6y ago

   The compute intensive methods are likely to deliver results much faster. http://incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html
4. 4.▲
   by dragongod2718 6y ago

   Why only a small margin?
5. 5.▲
   by dragongod2718 6y ago

   Wait, you think AI is overfunded?
6. 6.▲
   by dragongod2718 6y ago

   You both agree I think. He's not saying that GPT-3 invented the revolutionary ability of prompt programming, but that prompt programming allows GPT-3 to be applied to arbitrary contexts (from programming to providing legal advice to ge