drachir91

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by drachir91 3y ago

   This looks to me like it could work, but would need a ready force of technicians always expecting something like that so they can troubleshoot it in a timely manner.
2. 2.▲
   by drachir91 3y ago

   No, I do not. But HA systems work like that because hardware or network failure is what they are designed to guard against, not a latent bug in the software logic. If there's a software bug, both systems will exhibit the same behavior,
3. 3.▲
   by drachir91 3y ago

   I don't know but in recent years I'm increasingly seeing mission critical systems having only token or "apparent" rendundancies instead of real ones, and couldn't find any other rationale than cost savings and share
4. 4.▲
   by drachir91 3y ago

   What ticked me is that when the primary system threw in the towel, an EXACT SAME system took over and ran the exact same code on the exact same data as the primary. I know that with code and algorithms it's not always the case but even
5. 5.▲
   by drachir91 3y ago

   No, waypoints aren't spelled out with the ICAO alphabet. They are mnemonics that are pronounced as a word and only spelled out if the person on the receiving end requests it because of bad radio reception, or unfamiliarity with the are