doso

3 ms·

1.
Google Gemini 3 Pro Model Card [pdf](web.archive.org)
2 points by doso 11mo ago|1 comments
2.
by doso 11mo ago
is this real?
3.
by doso 1y ago
More context, Comet browser (which is Chromium-based) clearly states its use of Chromium in its Help > About Comet section (comet://settings/help). Similarly, other Chromium-based browsers like Dia (via Dia > About Dia)
4.
by doso 1y ago
That does help a bit—at least there is some public acknowledgment buried in the help docs. But isn’t BSD license attribution usually expected within the product itself (like a credits screen or in-app NOTICE)? It feels like this isn’t meeti
5.
by doso 1y ago
Thanks for mentioning atlas://credits! If it's not linked anywhere or visible to regular users, I'm not sure it really counts for proper attribution. License compliance usually means info is discoverable without digging—
6.
by doso 1y ago
Just to add some official context on this, Chromium's BSD license explicitly requires attribution in derivative works. The notice clause says: "Include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file…w
7.
by doso 1y ago
Honestly, it feels like they're intentionally trying to scrub any traces of Chromium or Google. No mention anywhere, blocked chrome:// pages, UI stripped of references—it's as if they don't want users to realize it&
8.
by doso 1y ago
Something's bugging me about Atlas - it's clearly Chromium-based (you can tell from the user agent and UI), but I can't find any credit to Chromium anywhere. No license info, no acknowledgments, and when I try to access chrom