door4

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by door4 8y ago

   Sure they could. Just pay for housing for all homeless SF residents. The only reason it doesn't happen is because people with money and power don't care enough to make the material sacrifices required to solve the problem.
2. 2.▲
   by door4 8y ago

   The Daily Mail is a tabloid and not worth responding to. Extreme poverty halved under Chavez. The most vulnerable citizens in Venezuela (poor, indigenous Venezuelans) are the strongest supporters of the socialist government. Venezuela has h
3. 3.▲
   by door4 8y ago

   GDP growth under socialism was always comparable with capitalist countries. And even despite being a relatively poor country and being under embargo from the US for nearly 70 years, Cuba has a higher literacy rate and life expectancy than t
4. 4.▲
   by door4 8y ago

   The difference is that Denmark won't face U.S. aggression for attempting to take care of its poor, but poorer countries in the global south have and will. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_
5. 5.▲
   by door4 8y ago

   Romania was an extremely poor country, and that has nothing to do with socialism. It was poor before socialism, and slightly less poor under socialism. Comparing it to living conditions in the U.S. is disingenuous. If this is what Bernie Sa