dongping

14 ms·

91.
by dongping 8y ago
Open source (~= free software) is aimed to protect the freedom of the user, not the freedom of the (proprietary) software developer. By forcing developers to disclose their changes to MongoDB essentially makes the end-users more free, since
92.
South Korea's fertility rate set to hit record low of 0.96(theguardian.com)
1 points by dongping 8y ago|0 comments
93.
by dongping 10y ago
Or Sci-Hub and Libgen.
94.
by dongping 10y ago
As there are countries where laws cannot be changed, technological solutions can fix the problems once and for all. Even in "democratic" country, you would still have to fight the lobbyists, corporate controlled media and so on.
95.
by dongping 10y ago
Sure, E2E is not enough. One would need plausible deniability from technologies like mixnet etc.
96.
by dongping 10y ago
The same holds for Telegram and Signal.
97.
by dongping 11y ago
The company will try to pay less whenever possible. And since your Argentinian friend don't have offers with higher salaries, he gets that particular amount. All developers will get the same if not for regulatory barriers (working pe
98.
by dongping 11y ago
The CEO is not even trying to do the damage control.
99.
by dongping 11y ago
It makes technically no sense if you can harmonize the regular driving condition into one single realistic cycle. Then the results are reproducible and comparable. OEMs all have their in-house driving cycle to better reflect the reality[1]
100.
by dongping 11y ago
There is a new testing procedure (WLTP, Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures). Major carmakers just want to delay it: http://www.transportenvironment.org/news/carmakers-pushing-3... The emission cycle us