donald123

9 ms·

31.
by donald123 8y ago
1. Have you actually read the survey you referenced? It is not just finding random people on the street, it's using "GfK Knowledge Panel® (GfK panel), a recruited internet panel designed to be nationally representative of U.S. hou
32.
by donald123 8y ago
Most of them have corporate or bulk subscription discount, and I'm sure you can also negotiate the contract with their sales.
33.
by donald123 8y ago
See, I'm already confused with all these simple generic words, do you expect average user could figure all these out?
34.
by donald123 8y ago
Bad thing is people will start calling it google one drive, because others won't know what you talking about by "google one".
35.
by donald123 8y ago
I guess what I meant by "hard to know" is less confusing. All the names in your example cannot be easily confused with other product or brand. But "Google One" is the other way around.
36.
by donald123 8y ago
If this is really the case, then I would say the name sucks. It's hard to know what 'Google One' means from just the name. And there is 'Android One', which is designed for low-end devices, it would really confuse p
37.
by donald123 8y ago
Do you really think they will start making things ready after all the equipments are moved in?
38.
by donald123 8y ago
The move-in started late in 2017. It's almost a year to do all the preparations.
39.
by donald123 8y ago
Given all the public job postings, how does it become a secret?
40.
by donald123 9y ago
Losing the ticket is NOT extremely rare chance at all. Avoiding troubles going public, versus losing all of the million dollars rewards, it's obvious what people would choose.
41.
by donald123 9y ago
Not exactly, it is advised by the lottery office to immediately sign your ticket. Otherwise it may create a lot of unnecessary troubles, like your ticket is lost, robbed, or some friend claims you had verbal agreement on splitting the rewar
42.
by donald123 9y ago
Having less hackers or taking hackers a little more effort to crack the password do not make it more secure in any ways. This is security through obscurity. Do you think the hackers will stop like a bear when they crack the first password?
43.
by donald123 9y ago
It would be pretty easy to identify accounts for same users. Most people use same email or username on most of their websites. The point of password managers are to have true different password for different site and users don't need t
44.
by donald123 9y ago
This is not necessarily true. Attackers with multiple sites' passwords can link users and look at their passwords. When they see some similarity of the passwords for the same user, it would take least effort for them to crack the passw
45.
by donald123 9y ago
Consider some portable password manager stored on a usb drive.
46.
by donald123 9y ago
This is the false sense of security through obscurity. Given the simple algorithm and without any entropy, it will be trivial to crack the password if the hacker has your multiple passwords. This is very possible since you are sticking to t
47.
by donald123 9y ago
It's not trivial to find that in the data. The cops are not required to keep the camera on all the time, or at least there is no consequence not doing so. They got the number from "administrative data", basically just police
48.
by donald123 9y ago
Do the earbuds actually do any of the translation work? I think they are just bluetooth earbuds with touch control, all the real-time translations are done in google's translation app. Google released this real-time conversation transl
49.
by donald123 9y ago
we should just send Trump to the moon and be the president of the whole planet.
50.
by donald123 9y ago
All I can say is google support is wildly inconsistent.
51.
by donald123 9y ago
Had a bad experience with google support as well. My 6p was bought from google store, had boot loop issue just about 2 weeks out of warranty, google support did not want to take responsibility, and huawei was kind enough to RMA the device f
52.
by donald123 9y ago
If this is true, then require looking directly into the camera is useless. Border agent could simply put a pair of sunglasses on you and unlock your phone easily.
53.
by donald123 9y ago
Why is this old article brought up again? Already discussed almost half year ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13968519
54.
by donald123 9y ago
no one can predict the future.
55.
by donald123 9y ago
Those restrictions are to prevent people sharing it. A single ticket is much more expensive than $10 already, without those restrictions, you bet people will share it with their family and friends, event "rent" it out to strangers
56.
by donald123 9y ago
"The DeepFlight Dragon starts at $1.5 million and will make its public debut at the Monaco Yacht Show on September 23. " This is from 2015.
57.
by donald123 9y ago
Think this way, if you have 100 widgets you promised to be delivered in a week, and you know you will have another 100 widgets coming in stock next week, would you take payment for 105 or more today, hoping at least 5 people do not mind to
58.
by donald123 9y ago
Agree, he could just stay over near SF during weekdays and fly back home with family on weekend. Time better spent and more economical.
59.
by donald123 9y ago
Anybody can take photos or videos in public area, so does the government. If you are so paranoid about your privacy, stay at home, order online, simple as that.
60.
by donald123 9y ago
They can corrupt one backup but not all backups. And a good backup software should do integrity check.

More ›